Archive

Monthly Archives: December 2014

Israel-did-911

The following letter was sent out by the 9/11 Truth Movement USA to websites and blogs, alternative news platforms and mainstream media outlets across America. They have been expressing an urgent need to expose the 9/11 false flag operation once and for all so that the nation can get back on the right track.

We feel the same urgency in this matter. Hence, we post the contents of the letter below.

imagesF24EPSAA

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hello 9/11 TRUTHER,

The following article on 9/11 has been described as “the most definitive piece”
on the 9/11 False Flag Operation. We think you may agree and trust that you
will disseminate it to help the Truth Movement advance this urgent cause.

9/11 False Flag Operation: HUGE Tipping Point As State-Sponsored Terrorism Is Exposed
State Actors That Staged 9/11 Terrorist Attacks Disclosed, Plot Revealed, Justice Inevitable

If you feel this exposé does not fit your site content, perhaps you will consider
one of the following excellent articles revealing 9/11 truth.

images91V483BR
9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators

9/11 Commission Report: The Most Ridiculous Conspiracy Theory Of All Time

9/11: The Ultimate Inside Job And False Flag Operation

NYC Watches WTC Building #7 Come Down Again This 9/11/14

VP Cheney Issued 9/11 Stand Down Order While Missile Approached Pentagon: Tip Of The Government Conspiracy

Over 2200 Architects And Engineers Demolish The ‘Official’ 9/11 Commission Report

Why Are NIST’s 9/11 WTC Reports False and Unscientific?

CIA Leak Gives ‘Incontrovertible Evidence’ That 9/11 WAS STATE SPONSORED

imagesR28KUYGF

9/11 US Government Criminal Conspiracy: THERE IS NO DEBATE

The 11 Most Compelling 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Nuclear 9/11 Revealed: Theories and Disinformation, the Misguided and the Inhuman

How was Building 7 implosion a perfectly controlled demolition on 9/11?

75 top professors and leading scientists claim 9/11 was ‘inside job’

9/11 Was A Hoax: The American government killed its own people

Keep up the GREAT work!
9/11 Truth Movement USA
911truthmovement.usa@gmail.com

P.S. Here are three comments about the first article shown above which were found on different websites on the internet:

images3NMNKKME


Anglo-American Axis Wages Full Scale War Against Russia

Trilateral Commission Crashes the Russian Ruble
after Imposing Illegal Sanctions and
Manipulating the Price of Oil Downward

Jesuit Weapons of War:
Economic Terrorism and Financial Sabotage
Commodity Speculation and Currency Manipulation   

report77616_1_tor

Michael Thomas
December 20, 2014
State of the Nation

State of the Nation

That a Nobel Peace Prize winner would lead the charge to bring wrack and ruin to a nation like Russia is not as surprising as one would think. The USA has always been used as the primary policeman for the Anglo-American Axis (AAA), especially when military aggression is required to prevent any given nation from leaving the dollar-denominated reservation.  Which is precisely why the Nobel Committee gave Barack Obama cover by fraudulently awarding him the ‘peace prize’.  They knew he would be leading the USA & Company against the Russian boogeyman in the not-too-distant future.  That future is 2014.

Prior to an outright military invasion the AAA has historically utilized their arsenal of economic assaults and financial attacks to soften up the enemy.  The current regime of extra-legal US and European sanctions, no matter what form they have taken, are all designed to destroy the Russian economy.  Whether it has been declared or not, the Western powers have commenced a full blown war against Russia.

What very few people realize is that Obama’s rise to the presidency ONLY occurred with his agreement to prosecute Russia whenever directed to do so.  In fact much of his 2008 election campaign rhetoric concerning foreign policy was peppered with language that clearly reflected his loyalty to the Cold Warriors of yesteryear.  How else does anyone think he could have accumulated a record-smashing $750 million in campaign contributions?

“In 21-plus months, Barack Obama raised roughly $750 million from donors, surpassing all of his White House opponents this year and also eclipsing the total amount of money raised by all of the presidential candidates combined in 2004.”[1]
(2008 ABC News Report)

The two key figures behind the unrivaled campaign chests amassed by Obama prior to both of his presidential elections were George Soros and Zbigniew Brzezinski. Only by understanding the true forces behind these two characters will the current war against Russia be properly understood. Suffice to say, that both individuals harbor an intense and irrational hatred toward Russia, as do all of their Cold Warrior co-conspirators who have colluded to collapse the Russian state.

OBAMA: Trilateral Commission Endgame | The Millennium Report

In the interest of completely subjugating Russia to the dictates of the Anglo-American Axis, these Russophobes have used the full force of the Trilateral Commission, a semi-secret stealth organization whose only purpose is complete world domination.  Zbigniew Brzezinski was a founding member and primary organizer of the Trilateral Commission, along with David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan and many other New World Order (NWO) profiteers.

The Cold War was in full swing in 1973 and those who wished to establish a New World Order were determined not to let the USSR stand in the way.  The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), from which the majority of Trilateral Commission (TC) founding members came from, had already established a distinctly anti-Russian stance since its inception in 1921.  Both the CFR and the TC have been prominently configured in the formulation of every major U.S foreign policy since their respective inceptions.  They have likewise advocated for every single major war that has occurred on the planet over the same span of time.

However, it is specifically the Trilateral Commission, under the influence of extremely Cold Warriors like Brzezinski and Soros, which is determined not to allow a thaw with Russia except on their uncompromising and dictatorial terms.  It’s important to understand both the personal history and temperaments of Cold Warriors like Brzezinski and Soros in order to correctly grasp the current state of world affairs.  Both originally hail from Eastern European countries —  Brzezinski from Poland and Soros from Hungary –which have had some some very difficult history with the old USSR.  Like all of their Cold War compatriots, they harbor intense animosity toward Russia and will not end their persecution until the Russian bear has been conquered … and put in a cage.

Convicted Felon George Soros … Russian Intelligence has fingered Soros for using cross-collateralized compounded Swedish and Danish foreign currency derivatives for the purpose of an attack on the Russian stock market.  Soros’ use of these cross-collateralized compounded derivatives utilizing Luxembourg banks violates the terms of the Basil II European Union banking agreement.[2]

The true irony here is that the entire Russian Revolution and rise of Communism across the Motherland was initiated and coordinated by New York City banksters, Chicago gangsters and Washington politicos.  All of those oppressed populations of Eastern Europe of the last century have none other to blame than their relatives who migrated to the ole US of A who engineered the whole misguided scheme.  Virtually all of the NWO think tanks, which form a cottage industry of Russia-bashing, are staffed by either Jewish intellectuals or dogmatic Catholics whose ancestral heritage is of Eastern (and/or Central) European descent.

This particular narrative has a number of key threads, each of which is critical to understanding what is really going on with the unfolding and undeclared World War III. Those threads have profound religious and philosophical, geo-political and social, economic and financial overtones.  They will be methodically elucidated in this series of three essays.

imagesAKG2LWCSPutin-Obama-Chess

Why is a Nobel Peace Prize winner prosecuting a war for a bunch of aging Cold Warriors?

Obama mysteriously emerged from what is perhaps the most politically corrupt city in the fifty states — Chicago.  Not only is Chicago the epicenter of neo-liberalism, it also has the largest per capita Polish population in America, and second only to New York City.  Likewise, the Chicago area is also the home to a large percentage of other Eastern/Central European immigrants with mindsets very similar to Brzezinski and Soros.

What’s the point?

Obama was raised in a political climate that wreaked of hatred for all things Russian.  He was even a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.  The University of Chicago (UoC) is world renown for being the home of the Leo Strauss Center, the philosophical father of the neoliberalism that is aggressively imposed around the globe by a powerful phalanx of neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz.  Former U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense under George W. Bush and ex-World Bank President, Wolfowitz was one of many other UoC Neocon graduates who was one of the key architects of the Iraq War — a classic case of disaster capitalism by way of a manufactured war promoted by neoliberal neoconservatives.

Understanding that Hillary Clinton was also raised in Chicago is perhaps the best way to unpack the baggage of this global, multi-decade conspiracy to systematically defraud … … THE COMMUNITY OF NATIONS. Not only was she raised in the same depraved political climate of Chicago, she was also appointed by Obama as his first Secretary of State (SOS), the herald of this nation’s exceedingly militaristic and unilateral foreign policy.  No other nation on Earth has exported so much faux democracy at the barrel of a gun, as Libya experienced while Clinton was SOS and ‘peace prize’ winner Obama was POTUS.  Syria is another hideous exercise in disaster capitalism that was began and accelerated under Secretary Clinton, as was the whole Arab Spring phenomenon.

imagesFTRQ2DRS

 

The Ukraine Is Only The Latest Foray Of Disaster Capitalism USA-Style.

These very same Cold Warriors quite purposefully executed the Kiev coup d’état in order to start a full-blown civil war in the Ukraine.  What better way to respond to President Vladimir Putin’s many domestic and international initiatives to move Russia away from the NWO reservation?  Putin has always known that it would come down to this — either the AAA way or a new Silk Road highway.  To better understand Putin’s critical role in this highly consequential confrontation, the following essay lays bare what will not be found in the mainstream media.

Vladimir Putin’s Russia: Perfect Foil To The Anglo-American Axis And Their New World ‘Order’

Quite fortunately for the Russian people, Putin has always acted in their best interest.  Now, however, will be the true test of their national character.  Vastly arrayed against the Russian motherland are the many AAA nations which have reflexively aligned with the intractable Cold Warriors.  Even though it is obviously not in their interest to do so, most Eastern European nations and some ex-Soviet Republics are closing ranks in what is shaping up to be the “War of the Titans”.  Goaded by the many countries within Anglo-American Axis, particularly the USA, the UK and Israel, these extremely misguided countries are somehow okay with being used as canon fodder in a potential World War III?!

The Ukraine is a graphic example of how this war might unfold within any one of their territories should the implementation plan for another civil war be duplicated by the AAA. The very same Neo-nazis being armed and financed there by the US State Department and City of London bankers represents the exact same MO which instigated World War II. Again, Russia is being targeted to sufficiently soften up that nation so as to render it vulnerable to another CIA-coordinated revolution.  In this way the Anglo-American Axis plans to install a puppet regime that is amenable to all manner of neoliberal economic policies, each of which will permit unfettered access to Russia’s wealth and natural resources, especially oil and gas, gold and silver, uranium and platinum.putnwo4

*The Anglo-American Axis is represented, first and foremost, by the major English-speaking countires of the world: USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel. The European member nations of NATO, such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands are also closely aligned with the AAA as are all the Scandinavian countries.  So are the Asian Pacific Rim nations of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines.  Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar also owe their allegiance to the AAA.  The World Shadow Government is a secret, supranational organization which completely controls the Anglo-American Axis, as well as the European Union, NATO, among many other institutional entities which constitute the Global Control Matrix.[3]

 

 

THIS STORY CONTINUES HERE (CLICK)

 

112114kingobama1

True to form the mainstream media has been doing its very best to keep the impact and reality of Obama’s immigration amnesty, power grab under wraps. DON’T LET THEM DO IT! Stay on your congressmen every single day to put a stop to this lawless act. Not only is history on our side but we are in the majority (and it isn’t even close). I don’t know about you but I am sick and tired of congress not doing what we sent them there to do! Here are the stats all on one place! You may not realize that this is the most important battle for our way of life and our quality of life we have ever been faced with! Nothing will set this country back further than allowing this to happen against our will!

2014-02-05-ea60f6d8

62% of US voters oppose Obama’s amnesty plan via executive action. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)
24% now say Obama has the legal authority to change immigration policy without agreement from Congress. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)
26% per cent are in favor of Obama’s plan. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)

75% of voters answering exit polls in the 2014 Midterm elections Reject Obama’s Executive decree amnesty plans and

80% did not Want Foreign Workers Taking Jobs from Americans. .” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)

74% of voters believed that “President Obama should work with Congress rather than around Congress on immigration and separately. .” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)
“Voters overwhelmingly prefer an immigration system that protects American workers,” the polling memo states. “Therefore members of Congress should feel confident that voters will support actions using the power of the purse to protect American workers from Obama’s executive amnesty threat.” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)

590x421xPoaching-590.jpg.pagespeed.ic.joxnjUrvea

90% of Americans Believe Illegal Immigration Serious Problem and most Want Expedited Deportations! (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

67% of respondents felt that illegal immigration was an “extremely” serious or “very serious” problem.

Another 22% felt it was a “somewhat serious” problem, while 10% said it was “not too/at all serious.” A majority of respondents said that illegal immigrant juveniles fleeing violence should not be given refugee status and feel the law should be changed so those not from Mexico and Canada can be more quickly deported. (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

Crazy_Border

64% of Americans believe “things in the U.S. feel like they are out of control right now and expressed mounting alarm about illegal immigration, . (Politico, October 20, 2014)
Nearly two-thirds of likely voters in battleground races this fall disapprove of President Barack Obama’s handling of immigration which should serve as a dire warning to Republicans like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, and other Republicans trying to help Obama pass amnesty. (Politico, October 20, 2014)

Nearly Two Thirds of Oregon Voters ‘Likely’ to Reject Driver’s Licenses for Illegals by rejecting Measure 88 on the Nov 4 ballot in Oregon, but illegal alien supporters are spending massive amounts of money to trick voters into supporting it instead!
61% of likely voters were opposed to Measure 88. 53% said they were “certain” to oppose the measure while another 8% said they were opposed to it but “may change mind.” 26% of Oregon voters said they supported giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants while 5% said they supported the measure but “may change mind.” (Oregon Public Broadcasting Poll, October 8-11, 2014)

THE LATEST DEMOCRAT VOTE DRIVE, OBAMACARTOON
63% of Hispanics and 57% of Blacks say the government is not doing enough to enforce U.S. immigration laws and 78% of Whites and 74% of all respondents want tighter border security! (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)
71% of Blacks and 63% of Hispanics believe the government “has a responsibility” to protect job-hungry Americans “from competition with illegal immigrants.” (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

About three-quarters of Whites (77%) and all respondents (74%) agree that the government has a duty to protect Americans from job competition by illegal aliens. (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

111714

71% of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, say that illegal immigrant newcomers should NOT receive government benefits! Only 16% think “they are entitled to government aid” while 13% are undecided. A strong majority (68%) also “say the new illegal immigrants should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have,” and that includes a plurality–and a near-majority–of Democrats (49%). The poll found that “89% of GOP voters and 70% of unaffiliated’s think illegals should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have! (Rasmussen Polling, October 1, 2014)

Gallup poll recently found that 65% of Americans disapprove Barack Obama’s handling of immigration while

68% opposed Obama’s handling of illegal immigration in an Associated Press-GfK poll. A recent Reuters poll found that

The-Path-To-Citizenship-Cartoon

70% of Americans believe illegal immigrants “threaten traditional U.S. beliefs and customs” while

63% felt that “immigrants place a burden on the economy.” And a Polling Company poll that found that a majority of Americans wanted fewer immigrants at this time found that
“90% of likely voters feel that “U.S.- born workers and legal immigrants already here should get first preference for jobs.” (Pew, Gallup, USA Today, and Press-GfK polls, August, 2014)

63% of all Americans oppose work permits for illegal immigrants!

63% opposed while only 34% approved.

The poll also found that 73% of Americans, including 78% of independents, 54% of Democrats, and 80% of young people, would rather have Obama work with Congress instead of going it alone. (Investors Business Daily/TIPP Poll August 23-34, 2014)

www.usnews.com

8 of 10 evangelicals reject clergy’s push for amnesty; 29% want border closed to future immigration, and 73 percent, said that, instead of bringing in more immigrant workers, employers should be ‘required to try harder to recruit and train, Americans from those high-unemployment groups. And most evangelicals, 68 percent, said they are willing to pay higher prices if it is necessary for employers to raise wages to fill jobs with Americans instead of adding more foreign workers. 75 percent chose that “nations have a moral and sovereign right to decide which and how many immigrants can enter.” just 12 percent of 1,000 likely evangelical voters believe that the Old Testament verses on the “stranger among us” mean the government should give work permits and legal status to illegal immigrants. according to (Pulse Opinion Research — February 23, 2014)
71% of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, say that illegal immigrant newcomers should NOT receive government benefits!”90% of likely voters feel that “U.S.- born workers and legal immigrants already here should get first preference for jobs.” (Pew, Gallup, USA Today, and Press-GfK polls, August, 2014)
71% of Blacks and 63% of Hispanics believe the government “has a responsibility” to protect job-hungry Americans “from competition with illegal immigrants.” (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

111714

90% of Americans Believe Illegal Immigration Serious Problem and most Want Expedited
Deportations! (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

Any Question?

 

sandy-hook-non-hoax

The bank that took control of the house where Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter Adam Lanza lived burned all the items left in the house to ensure that no one could sell them as murder memorabilia. “There is nothing left but the light fixtures; we burned everything from the carpets to any personal effects left behind,” said William LaCalamito, a senior vice president for Hudson Savings Bank of New Jersey, which turned the house over to the town of Newtown this week at no cost. “We didn’t want anything from that house showing up for sale on eBay two years from now.”

Sandy-Hook-demolition

The Newtown Legislative Council approved the transfer of the property at 36 Yogananda St. from the bank to the town on Wednesday, ending a process that started several months ago when Ryan Lanza, the heir to his mother Nancy Lanza’s estate, agreed to turn over the property for $1 to a limited liability corporation, which then transferred it to Hudson Bank. Town officials have been discussing the land transfer for about a month.

Nancy Lanza was the first person that Adam Lanza allegedly (yah right)  killed on Dec. 14, 2012, shooting her four times with a .22-caliber rifle while she slept in the house. He then drove to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and shot and killed 20 first-graders and six adults before killing himself. (Not) Adam-Lanza

State police took a number of items out of the house soon after the shootings.

The bank is absorbing a mortgage of nearly $400,000 that Nancy Lanza had on the 3,100-square-foot home. The yellow house was built in 1998 and is on 2.19 acres in a high-end residential subdivision.

“It is not common that a bank is driven by compassion and not by profits, but that was the case here,” Newtown First Selectman Patricia Llodra said Thursday.

Good thing they didn’t bull doze the school and destroy all of that evidence that would have shown this government false flag for what it was …ooops I guess that was the first thing they did …well then This story (and it is a story) CONtinued here…(click)  For everyone else with any critical thinking skills and the desire to have the freedom to make up their own mind check out these facts supported by these links instead:

Going-in-circles

Sandy Hook was a hoax:

* The school was closed by 2008

* There was no evacuation of nearly 500 students and 75 staff

* The iconic photo of a line of children and a police woman was staged and shot twice

* The official report on Sandy Hook does not connect the alleged shooter with his victims or the weapons he is alleged to have used.

If anyone still has doubts about it, check out the following articles in Veterans Today:“Sandy Hook: Ten more proofs that vitiate the official account” (3 September 2014) www.veteranstoday.com

“Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died” with Sofia Smallstorm interviewing (13 June 2014) www.veteranstoday.com

“Sandy Hook Elementary School: closed in 2008, a stage in 2012” with Amanda (15 April 2014) www.veteranstoday.com

“Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax” with Vivian Lee, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Jim Fetzer and other members of the Sandy Hook Research Group (7 January 2014) www.veteranstoday.com

hCex3Uz

AK-Vaccine-47_Color

A Shot Never Worth Taking: The Flu Vaccine ~ by Kelly Brogan, MD

Deep into my 6th year of researching and investigating the damning science that condemns vaccine efficacy and safety – yes, all of them – I am beginning to turn my attention more to the societal memes and the individual belief systems that protect and perpetuate tragically flawed and unacceptably dangerous collective behaviors. The information is OUT THERE, brilliant scientists, physicians, and researchers without financial ties and agendas have weighed in and presented their concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, however, the average citizen resists and clings to a hyper-simplified, seemingly “safe” stance. “Well, I’m not against vaccines, I mean, they’ve done a lot. I’m sure there are some risks, but they’re extremely rare.” I understand, now, that, my collection of PubMed articles substantiating concerns about inefficacy, neurological, autoimmune, and fatal risks of these poorly conceived and anachronistically relevant immune modulators is not meaningful to someone who is not interested.

images797ZZAKR

The questions raised by this information are not provocative to someone who needs, above all, to believe that the government, the CDC, and doctors mean well, are doing their due diligence, and that they are holding themselves to a basic standard of ethical delivery of healthcare. They are not meaningful to someone who needs to outsource their power. Instead of debating the science, what it may take to change to bring awareness to this egregious misuse of medical authority is, one of two, non-scientific, anecdotal exposures:

1.They see it doesn’t work, and may even cause illness

Have-you-vaccinated-your-infant-government-medicine-what-could-go-wrong-by-Liam-Scheff-2010-med

I have several pediatricians as patients. Unprovoked, all of these women have confessed to me that they have observed increased virulence in their vaccinated populations. It is this clinical experience that has given them pause about the heavy-handed mandate coming down from the CDC. “Oh!” I say, “Have you read the studies that suggest increased risk of infection in the vaccinated population? There’s THAT ONE where they actually used a saline placebo in 115 children and found that those vaccinated had a 4.4 times increased rate of non-flu infection? Or how about that CANADIAN ONE where they looked at 4 observational studies and found that 2008-2009 H1N1 vaccination was associated with a1.4 to 2.5 increased risk of actually contracting said virus?” Only after they have a personal template within which to fit the science affirming their observations, do they have room to hear it. But what of all of the children they have brought this ineffective and dangerous intervention to?

imagesCK2G1QZX

2.They know someone harmed

It is basic human psychology that what is out over there is irrelevant at best, and threatening at worst. What is near and familiar is what is true. Few of us seek to bridge gaps between what we are surrounded by and what may be out there to learn. The difficulty of appreciating the scale of harm brought to the population by vaccination practice is related to the insidious nature of immune and neurologic insult. The CDC can report, as they do, that brain inflammation and death are known side effects of every vaccine, but most do not appreciate what brain inflammation looks like. That this can look like ADHD, autism, learning delay, and that autoimmune disorders can take years to manifest. Tracing the thread back to the vaccine exposure can only be done with studies that assess vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. These have not been done.

imagesVGTP4YPO

Tragically, we all know, now, of someone who has died from the flu vaccine, just this past week. CHANDLER WEBB, a healthy 19 year old, was given a “routine” and “recommended” flu vaccine at his physical, one day before he became violently ill, and one month before he died. He died from vaccine-induced encephalitis, a known risk of this intervention. In addition to feeling remorse for the pain that this family is experiencing, I feel rage for what I believe to be manslaughter. This is a medical intervention, delivered without any regard for its objectively determined lack of efficacy, and its potential to maim and kill healthy adults. The propaganda surrounding this CDC and government-endorsed practice is so thick that doctors treating this young man were blind to even the most obvious of causative insults. If doctors cannot appreciate a documented adverse event that occurs within 24 hours, you cannot expect the system to acknowledge more complex disturbances to the immune system and neuorologic development that will land you and your loved ones on medications and in therapies for life. And, remember, that this family cannot sue the physician who pushed the needle or the pharmaceutical company who created the lethal product.

I think about the Cliff’s Notes version, a distillation of why the flu vaccine is evidence that our government and regulatory bodies have forgotten us, and are following an objective that may leave you lying dead on the side of the road. I know that few of you will read the papers that I have read, attend lectures, seminars, and dialogue with concerned experts. If nothing else, digest these important points, and then wait until this issue gets close enough to you to change your mind on it…hopefully before it’s too late.

It’s not indicated: I’m sure you don’t know a single person who has died of the flu, and if you think you do, I can almost guarantee you that the diagnosis was not confirmed in a way that ruled out the 150-200 infectious pathogens that cause flu-like syndromes, none of which would be “covered” by the vaccine. Despite the astronomical figures the CDC flashes before us of “flu deaths”, there were 18 (yes, 1-8) confirmed in 2001, for example. Access to these figures is suspiciously concealed, but in the end, forget the stats, and use some common sense to see the fear mongering and sales marketing for what it is.

33-vaccine-in-6-years

It doesn’t work: The Cochrane Database – an objective, gold-standard assessment of available evidence has plainly stated, in TWO STUDIES, that there is no data to support efficacy in children under two, and in adults. Even the former Chief Vaccine Officer at the FDA states: “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.” Liking the idea of being protected from the flu does not equate to being protected from the flu. That’s essentially what your vaccine-promoting doctor (or pharmacist) is engaging in – promoting an idea.

Should there ever be a medical intervention appropriate for everyone? It’s being pushed on demographics where it is known to be ineffective, or is unstudied and likely unsafe including children, adults, elderly, and pregnant women as reviewed on THIS WEB SITE and GREENMEDINFO. I write about how this offends my sensibilities as a perinatal physician HERE.

We just don’t know what we are doing: The grave possibility of undetectable viral proteins in the chick embryos used to culture vaccines is just an example of how the immune roulette of vaccine development and rampant implementation has resulted in death and lasting injury. C. jejeuni contamination, for example, IS THEORIZED TO PLAY A ROLE in documented risk of Guillain-Barre paralysis after flu vaccine. Producing antibody response to virus and associated toxic preservatives is not immunity. We know that now.

imagesD0QHJAZC

As those of us who shake our heads in pain and frustration watching the sheep get herded off the cliff, we refrain: these agents cannot be considered “safe and effective” and also “unavoidably unsafe” as the government agencies would have us accept. They are avoidably unsafe, in fact, when you don’t use them as part of your healthcare. ~Kelly Brogan, MD –

kbrogan

See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/11/27/a-shot-never-worth-taking-the-flu-vaccine-by-kelly-brogan-md/#sthash.1pf252nV.dpuf

– See more at: http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/11/27/a-shot-never-worth-taking-the-flu-vaccine-by-kelly-brogan-md/#sthash.1pf252nV.dpuf

For those of you who read Zerohedge you will be familiar with Tyler Durden’s ability t constantly supply insightful commentary on whats happening in our financial markets today and why …I have never read a treatment of this topic spelled out so that even the unsophisticated can understand it and in doing so he is calling out the shadow government who is quickly putting this country on a collision course with its own destruction and enslavement. This great article written by Mark Jeftovic  will wake a few more people up to what’s really happening, by whom, and why!  E

Tarp Christmas Card

Cronyism In The 21st Century

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/21/2014 22:48 -040

Authored by Mark E. Jeftovic, CEO easyDNS Technologies; originally posted at DollarVigilante.com,

Ghandi was once asked, “What do you think about Western Civilization?” to which he famously replied “I think it’s a good idea.” He may as well have been talking about free market capitalism.

Capital in the 21st Century has hit the world like a new teen idol sensation. Everybody is drinking the Kool-Aid and its being held up as the most important book ever written on the subject of how runaway capitalism leads to wealth inequality. Paul Krugman of course, loves it. As does every head of state and political hack in the (formerly) free world. A text-book sized brick that can be condensed down to a couple bullet points:

bagley1020

  • that unchecked capitalism leads to increasing wealth inequality, and
  • this can be fixed through government management, most notably more taxes and higher minimum wages.

What’s not to love?

There are many other refutations of Capital circulating, most of which address the numerous factual errors and flawed research methodologies in the book, and countering the income equality assertions with observations around how the standard of living generally increases across the board during periods of free(er) market capitalism (such as England during the industrial revolution under the classical gold standard or wider Europe during the High Middle Ages).

The age we live in today is not an example of this. I submit that the modern run of standard of living increases, say from end of WWII to present is not an example of “free markets given room to run”, but rather a crack-up boom fuelled by credit expansion (cheap money) and cheap energy. This era is now drawing to a close, as the cost of energy inexorably rises and the global debt super-cycle finally hits a wall. After decades of government targeted inflation, after the better part of a decade of ZIRP, after increased regulations in every aspect of our lives, after civil liberties being for the most part abolished (after all, the government is allowed to assassinate any one of us and we are all under continuous pervasive surveillance) what is difficult to fathom is that political economists can still make hay in the world by blaming its problems on capitalism gone wild and runaway free markets. Put simply, true capitalism requires free markets, free markets require a free society and we do not live in a free society.

dfgf

So let’s do something different here and accept a core premise of Capital, and say that wealth inequality is increasing, and that it’s a bad thing. Where the point is completely missed is in what causes it (ostensibly “free market capitalism”) and what to do about it (increase government control, induce more inflation and raise taxes).

The point of this essay is to assert that it is not unchecked capital or runaway free markets that cause increasing wealth inequality, but rather that the underlying monetary system itself is hard-coded by an inner temple of ruling elites in a way which creates that inequality.

We’ll see that wealth doesn’t “run away” in a logarithmic fashion (perhaps hinted at by Pareto and captured in various “1% memes”) but rather can be best visualized as a vortex, like a tornado, or more accurately, a black hole, a centre swirling around a political/monetary/cronyist nexus that sucks wealth into it from the periphery (the rest of society). Society itself is hard-wired to facilitate this in such an entrenched and subtle fashion that we have arrived in a zeitgeist in which the key facets of this system (the nature of money itself) is out-of-scope. It’s not even part of the debate because almost everybody in society is oblivious to it’s machinations. (This is the reason why in my writings I do not refer to underclass or overclass but rather, the “outer-class” and the inner elites.)

erget

Because the nature of money itself has been so, for lack of a better word, “esotericized”, I need to include Stephen Zarlenga’s seminal work “The Lost Science of Money” in our expose. While Zarlenga blesses us with an exhaustive study of money and banking practices throughout history, and does a superb job deconstructing the perniciousness of central banking and debt based money systems, he erroneously arrives at conclusions favouring direct government creation of fiat money (he even came out in favour of that whole “Trillion Dollar Coin” idea because to him it signaled a tacit admission that the government doesn’t really need the Federal Reserve). However even his arrival at this seemingly (to us) off-base solution tells us something vital about the system within which we are all immersed.

This is what it tells us: if smart, scholarly people happen to believe that government fiat money is both feasible and beneficial to society, and they put serious thought into devising such a system, what they will not come up with is one run by private central banks issuing debt-based money. They just won’t. Any critical analysis would grasp that such architecture would become a parasitic cancer on the entire society. When you realize this, it’s hard not to posit a far-reaching conspiracy to institutionalize inequality. While I am a big believer in the maxim “never ascribe to conspiracy what can be explained by stupidity” it to me falls short in this case. When we look at the structure of the entire monetary system and realize that it’s the worst way possible to design such a system if you have the best interests of the wider society in mind then you can’t help but ask in whose interests was it designed and implemented?

As such, the system within which we find ourselves seems to be one that isn’t designed to be in the best-interest of most of us reading this (and would remain true even if you were inexplicably reading this on Huffington Post, Slate or Business Insider).

images

If we want to understand where wealth inequality comes from, “The Lost Science of Money” is a good place to start  for two reasons: 1) his book is an exhaustive history of money, even if one disputes some of his takeaways from it) and 2) like many libertarians and an-caps, he understands the pernicious, malignant effect of private central banking. His ideal solutions may not fly (government controlled fiat, because governments will always inflate and debase) but his exposure of the fraud is convincing. Zarlenga’s main thesis can be put briefly that the primary arena of human struggle throughout history has been mainly over the monetary control over societies. If Zarlenga had to put it in one sentence, which he did, it would be this one:

“It is by misdefining the nature of money, special interests have often been able to assume control of society’s monetary system, and in turn, the society itself”. (emphasis added, and you’ll see why soon). He broke his book (almost as big as Capital) down into sections, examining that:

  • The Main Obstacle is The Mystification of Money
  • Monetary History Has Been Ignored
  • Monetary History Has Been Censored
  • Monetary Data is Often Misinterpreted

All of which is correct and explains why a book like Capital is on the New York Times Best Seller List. The premise that wealth inequality is caused by unchecked capital formation (a.k.a runaway free markets or capitalism gone wild) derives from the biggest misinterpretation of them all. It’s not only monetary data that is misinterpreted, it’s the entire framework around monetary policy itself which leads to these increasing imbalances. In other words, it is the structure of our monetary system itself which institutionalizes accelerating wealth inequality. Thus, taxation, intentional inflation, credit expansion, money supply injections and central planning all exacerbate income inequality, they do not alleviate it. Pikkety is a political economist (as is Krugman) and Zarlenga calls political economists the “Priesthood of the Bankers.” Among the Priesthood I’ll again list off Zarlenga’s bullet points but this time I’ll inject my own interpolation of their meaning in today’s climate:

jackson

Ideas rule:

Here we mean academic political economists with no real world financial, market or business experience devise elegant theories which look good on a blackboard, will earn them Nobel Prizes and become ensconced into the prevailing orthodoxy of conventional economic thought. Governments can then utilize these theories (or self-serving adaptations of them) to justify monetary polices that enable them to live beyond their means or otherwise further their own interests and those of their cronies.

 

These policies are utterly backwards in that they posit what economic forces should do according to some model, instead of trying to understand what they actually do based on observed results. When you do unleash Nobel laureates with their theoretical constructs on the real world, you don’t get “green shoots”, you get LTCM.

Economists as propagandists.

Two words: Paul Krugman.

Economics degenerates from the scholastics

Even the untouchable pillar of Keynesianism is a bastardized caricature of what Keynes actually said, which was that governments could smooth out the business cycle by deficit spending during bust years by running surpluses during the boom years. In it’s most basic form this just means saving for a rainy day. But governments don’t do that, because (as people like Krugman opine) “the government doesn’t have to pay it’s bills”. Thus, it’s all deficit spending, all the time. The last US president to actually run a surplus and pay down debt was Eisenhower (the so-called Clinton era surpluses were a sleight-of-hand fiction). The last president to pay off the debt was Andrew Jackson.

Fostering a disdain for the lessons of history

You can look at almost any financial panic, especially over the last hundred years, and you’ll see the same thing play out repeatedly.

 

For example, if you go back and look at the S&L crisis and the policy response to it, one is stricken with the similarities between then and now, how nothing was actually resolved in the policy response to S&L, in fact just the contrary, how bad behavior and incompetence were rewarded instead of allowed to be punished via free enterprise rules of engagement.

13-04-01_01_b

 

The pattern is as follows:

  •     poor policy, credit expansion, government management of the economy (i.e. housing bubble) and insulation from consequences by special interests (bankers, etc) leads to a panic.
  •     government bails out bad actors at public expense
  •     massive wealth transfer from public to elites occurs
  •     free markets and runaway capitalism blamed
  •     additional regulations imposed restricts range of operations of non-elite players while enabling elite cronies to externalize losses
  •     additional controls over economy enacted (ZIRP, new regulations, etc)
  •     increased government debt (stimulus, etc)
  •     next wave crack-up boom inducedIn Special Privilege,  a chapter entitled “The Recurring Nightmare” enumerates the serial financial panics of the 19th and early 20th centuries (to wit: The Panic of 1819, The Panic of 1837, The Panic of 1857, The Panic of 1873, The Panic of 1893, and the Panic of 1907, whose policy response led in a straight line to The Federal Reserve Act of 1913). LoCascio poses the question “Isn’t There A Lesson Here?” He went on to observe,LoCascio published Special Privilege in 2001 (he died in 2006), but large swaths of his work could easily be cut and pasted into the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis and no doubt, will be highly germane during the forthcoming, next crisis. The only difference being that after the next, inevitable (possibly imminent) wave of financial panic, it may be impossible to kick the can down the road yet another time. We may have finally, collectively come to the end of the line on “the great fiat monetization of everything” and be barreling toward the brick wall of unsustainability at the end of the runway.The big question around wealth inequality is this: why does wealth inequality increase as the distance from the nexus of political power increases? Why does wealth concentrate toward the centre? When asked this plainly, the answer becomes just as obvious: because the system is rigged that way.Whether you don’t believe in a classical gold standard (Zarlenga) or you do (LoCascio), whether you think bitcoin is viable or lunacy, where all these schools of thought intersect is at the point that finds private, fractional central banking a blight on civilization that leads to cronyism oligarchy between banksters, career politicians and corporate/kleptrocrat elites and this is the point that is most vociferously relegated out-of-scope in any kind of dialog around today’s central, pressing issues of the time.“The ultimate crisis will occur when the situation is so thoroughly perverted that the defenders of the status quo can no longer resurrect confidence in the system.”People are still very willing to believe in Unicorn Economics, the emergence of crypto-currencies such as bitcoin point to a widening rejection of that, but it will likely not achieve critical mass until the wheels come off the current system altogether.As I completed writing this essay, the ECB announced negative interest rates, in other words NIRP. This is sold to the public as a mechanism to spur bank lending to – again – stimulate the economy. What nobody asks is how the financial system can be so distorted, so perverted that policymakers can simultaneously implement negative interest rates while holding on to claims of legitimacy around their ability to “regulate” or “manage” the economy, or that the wider society is actually benefiting from these policies. If you think – and I know some otherwise highly intelligent people who do – that this is just some highly abstract financial smoke and mirrors that doesn’t really mean much in the real world, remember where you read this first: when NIRP fails to stimulate lending, the next Big Idea in Unicorn Economics will be to target money velocity and put expiry dates on cash. It’s the next logical step once you’ve entered the Twilight Zone as we have, and that’s also what you get when a global monetary system based on perpetually expanding debt approaches the end of the runway. (Or as as Fiat Paper Money author Ralph T Foster put it,  “Reading history is a harmless pastime, reliving it is another matter.”)
  • government sachs 2

 

  • Postscript:
  • What Pikkety has succeeded in is proving that we are not there yet. The propensity of the masses to rally behind this shows that confidence in the system is still long and strong. But what we are seeing are fissures in the logic – not only in books like Capital in the 21st Century but in entirely new and nonsensical economic schools of thought seemingly conjured out of thin air for the sole purpose of justifying and explaining away the otherwise unavoidable distortions and non-sequiturs of our economy (such as Modern Monetary Theory and Modern Monetary Realism – more on those in another post ).
  • As LoCascio predicts,
  • Because that is wealth inequality in action. When looked at from this angle you are able to see the underlying flawed assumptions that are otherwise considered “out of scope.”
  • This is what is so maddening about the irony of a book like Capital, chock full of fallacious data and erroneous conclusions makes Pikkety hotter than Justin Bieber, while brilliant historians such as LoCascio die in obscurity. The fact is that financial panic, followed by institutional wealth transfer (and confiscation) is systemically ingrained into what is called “conventional economic thought”
  • “During the 50 years of the National Banking System, currency had increased from roughly  $1 billion to $3 billion –or, by a factor of 3. Bank loans on the other hand, grew from roughly $0.5 billion to $13 billion–or by a factor of 25. This provides a rough numerical measure of the tendency (which continues to this day) that money creation has been tied to debt creation by banks.”
  • Little if any attention, however, was focused on the role the prior euphoria played in causing the resulting panic. Rather, attention was focused on the panics themselves and the virtually unanimous conclusion by those in position to bring about reform, was the great elasticity of currency would ameliorate, if not eliminate, the panics.”
  • “The 19th century and early 20th century  panics were so uniformly accompanied by the liberal extension of credit for speculative purposes that any serious reviewer of these events could not possibly fail to hypothesize a likely causative relationship.
  • The cycle repeats each time ensuing bubble and subsequent meltdown increasing by an order of magnitude. Which brings us to Vincent LoCascio, probably the most under appreciated commentators on our monetary system of this era. If ever there was a pair of “must” read books about what really causes wealth inequality in our society it is his Special Privilege: How the Monetary Elite Benefit… At Your Expense, and The Monetary Elite vs Gold’s Honest Discipline.
The Car Guyz

Auto Industry Experts Playing for the Other Team ...You!

FOXNews.com

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Rush

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Breitbart News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Drudge Retort

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Fathers' Rights Blog

by Jeffery M. Leving

therightwingextremist

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: