Economic growth

To say that Barack Obama is an ideologue isn’t going to make national news at this point, that much is a given. Anyone with a pulse and an IQ over 6 has known that since before Obama took office in 2008, and even most liberals not registering any brain activity would have admitted as much once Obama secured his re-election in the 2012 election. It’s also not major news to say that Obama and his administration have been the most corrupt administration in recent memory, or that they subscribe to the philosophy of, “The ends justify the means,” the Constitution be damned…


With all that said, if recent weeks have shown us anything at all, they have shown us that Hillary Clinton is infinitely more corrupt than Obama, even more of a sociopath, not to mention a stone-cold killer when you consider that FIVE of her political enemies died from very strange and mysterious deaths in the last SIX weeks alone, making the number of dead former Clinton associates totaling 67 people. Coincidences? Hardly! Well, it gets worse…

146ocf reports:

Following the conventions, a pattern has emerged from the polling: Donald Trump has taken a commanding lead in all demographics. From the well to poorly educated and even out-performing Romney among women and Hispanics. According polling aggregates the only demographic Hillary is winning is African American single women and White College Males with advanced degrees in Social Sciences.

If that’s the case, then how is Hillary Clinton leading in all the polls considering THIS was the scene at the Democrat National Convention (below) WHILE Hillary was speaking (if you listen you can hear her)?



ISIS is a Hillary Clinton State Department creation.

Did you know that beyond the fundamantalism of their Wahhabi creed they are a mercenary army? That they are being paid salaries and being armed by our regional allies?

The failed state of Libya – now a breeding ground for ISIS and a jump off point for the influx of war-refugees into the EU – is not a Hillary Clinton/Obama feature?!


Hillary Clinton Is a Threat to All of Humanity

by James Corbett
July 24, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Wall Street-backed warmonger whose potential election as President of the United States this November poses an existential threat not just to Americans but to all of humanity.

As First Lady and then as Senator, she actively supported the US’ illegal wars of aggression abroad:

BILL CLINTON: “Today, our Armed Forces joined our NATO allies in airstrikes against Serbian forces ,esponsible for the brutality in Kosovo.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “You know I voted for the Iraqi resolution.”

CLINTON: “The President understands this. He’s fully aware that it’s going to take a lot of patience and pain-staking planning and we’re gonna support him!”

CLINTON: “…including thousands of chemical weapons. Large volumes of chemical and biological stocks. A number of missiles and warheads. A major lab equipped to produce Anthrax.”


She not only admitted the US role in creating Al Qaeda:

CLINTON: “When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea there we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else, to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan.”

But then, despite this admission, as Secretary of State her support of the war on Libya and the jihadis in Syria directly led to the rise of ISIS and the migrant crisis in Europe:

CLINTON: “The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it’s time for Assad to get out of the way.”

“President Assad is not indispensable and we have absolutely nothing invested in him remaining in power.”

“I think based on definitions of war-criminal and crimes against humanity, there would be an argument to be made that he (Assad) would fit into that category.”

CLINTON: “Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”

CLINTON: “We came. We saw. He died! (laughter)”


She was the one who announced the US’ so-called “Asia-Pacific Pivot” that has seen more US forces being placed in the Asia-Pacific as a direct military threat to China:

CLINTON: “…and we look to the Asia-Pacific region, as we have for many decades, as an area where the United States in uniquely positioned to play a major role.”

CLINTON: “The United States is not seeding the Pacific to anyone.”

And she has stated in no uncertain terms that Russia and Iran will be militarily targeted in a Clinton presidency, and that the “nuclear option” is, as always, “on the table”:

CLINTON: “And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand, that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action.”

“There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken of the table. That has been my position consistently.”

CLINTON: “And Russia has to support the international community’s efforts sincerely or be held to account.”

CLINTON: “That Russia and China will pay a price. Because they are holding up progress, blockading it. That is no longer tolerable.”


And unlike her many, many political statements of convenience that are merely a reflection of what is most politically acceptable at the moment:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?”



CLINTON: “I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples.”

CLINTON: “I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York and I went to Wall Street and in December of 2007 before the big crash that we had. And I basically said ‘cut it out, quit foreclosing on homes. Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.’”

“Now who’s exactly the blame for the housing crisis? Now I think there’s plenty of blame to go around. Home-buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income, should of known that they were getting in over their heads.”

“I take a back-seat to no one when you look at my record on standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

“I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails.”

JAMES COMEY: “Lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

CLINTON: “So that the emails were immediately captured and preserved.”

COMEY: “There was no archiving at all of her emails.”


…we can be assured that these threats of potential nuclear world war by Clinton are not idle threats. A future Clinton president would be assured of a like mind in the new Prime Minister in the UK, who has stated in no uncertain terms that she is willing to launch a nuclear strike that would kill hundreds of thousands:

GEORGE KEREVAN: “Let me congratulate the Prime Minster on her new rule, but can we cut to the chase? Is she personally prepared to authorize a nuclear-strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?”

THERESA MAY: “Yes. And I have to say to the honourable gentleman, the whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it.”

Hillary Clinton is a neocon, a war hawk, a liar, an unindicted criminal and a Wall Street puppet. Why is it, then, that those on the so-called “progressive” left who would be warning against her if she had an “R” next to her name are instead lecturing other leftists that it is now their duty to fall in line and help her get elected?

NOAM CHOMSKY: “If Clinton is nominated and it comes to a choice between Clinton and Trump, in a swing state, a state where it’s going to matter which way you vote, I would vote against Trump, and by elementary arithmetic, that means you hold your nose and you vote Democrat. I don’t think there’s any other rational choice. Abstaining from voting or, say, voting for, say, a candidate you prefer, a minority candidate, just amounts to a vote for Donald Trump, which I think is a devastating prospect, for reasons I’ve already mentioned.”

JUAN GONZALES: “We in SDS refused to vote. We wouldn’t support McCarthy. We wouldn’t support Humphrey. Our slogan was “Vote with your feet, vote in the street.” I’m—I’m here to tell you that the slogan was right, the tactic was wrong. And I think that the country, in retrospect, there would not have been a substantive change, there would have been a positive change, if Nixon had not been elected. But you learn from your mistakes. Hopefully, other generations learn from the mistakes of those who came before them.”

ELIZABETH WARREN: We’re all here today because we’re with her. And we’re going to work our hearts out to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States.

BERNIE SANDERS: “She will be the Democratic nominee for president, and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.”


The message here is as clear as it is predictable and disappointing. Once again those with the influence to shape these events and ignite a genuine protest movement against Hillary’s coronation at the Democratic National Convention are falling back into their roles as partisan ideologues, advocating for “their” candidate over the “other side,” taking the two-party system as a fait accomplis and complicity with that system as the only way forward.

But as Michel Chossudovsky of points out, this election is fundamentally different. This time, the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY: “In so many words Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy stance is ‘to blow up the planet.’ She has made statements to the effect that a first-strike nuclear attack against Russia or Iran is on the table. So that if she is in the White House she could in fact unleash the unspoken, which is World War 3. I think this is something we have to address both in terms of analysis and also political choice. That anyone who wants to blow up the planet is not ‘progressive.’

“Secondly, she has a criminal record. Not only in regards to the email scandal but also in relation to The Clinton Foundation, which is involved in fraud, money laundering, political cronyism, etc. It is amply documented.

“So that, in effect, the choice for the American people is to elect a war-criminal.”


Too many people become attached to the personality of these political personas or fixated on the “D” or the “R” after their name. This clouds their judgement and stops them from seeing their policies and agenda for what they really are.

As Diana Johnstone, author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton points out, Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

DIANA JOHNSTONE: “I mean Hillary to me is not even an interesting person. She is simply a shallow, ambitious woman. Who has decided to make herself the instrument of the Washington think-tank persuasion and is using that too pose as a great expert on world affairs to be elected as President. She simply is the embodiment of all that is terrible in American foreign-policy that has developed over the past decades.”

It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world. It is incumbent on people of all stripes–American and non-American, Republican and Democrat, progressive and libertarian, anarchists, and those who have never thought about politics a day in their life–to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, work against her campaign for President, and avert the nuclear nightmare that is now coming into view.

The story continues here at its source (click here)72a26a5e1aa53908371a6684bed5888c

obama-tax-hikes-one-track-mind-political-cartoon 1365176059_2392_FT183103_real_cost_of_obamacare_obama_cartoons

Whenever austerity measures and budget cutbacks are discussed there is an immediate chorus of “Nooooo’s” that come from the left. Along with their tried-and-true name-calling and mudslinging and claims that it’s a “war on the poor” , “it’s a war on children” and that millions of people will die if they don’t get their food stamps or other entitlements in a timely fashion. Lately, they have even latched on to a nonemotional argument namely that austerity measures and reduced government spending will cripple the slowly healing economy. These are the same economic illiterates who wholeheartedly support “Obamacare” otherwise known as “Obamatax”. Even the Nancy Pelosi and dirty Harry Reid all the way up to the president with all of his epic wisdom have voiced the same concern about spending cuts…


To the extent that their ideas regarding reduced spending could hamper our nonexistent recovery every single first year economics student… And most fifth-graders know that you don’t raise taxes in the middle of her recovery or during a recession. Why then is nobody talking about the disastrous effects which will most certainly follow the largest tax increase in the history of our Republic?

The joint committee on taxation released a report early this year on the tax provisions associated with the affordable care act. The report identified 21 tax increases included in this bill which totaled over $1 trillion… Which was much more than the initial assessment which surprises nobody. In fact this estimate is twice the 500 billion estimate produced at the time the law was passed under less than aboveboard ways. Hasn’t anybody stopped to consider the impact of the government pulling another $1 trillion out of the economy? How about huge amounts of money that will be used by the 20 million or so Americans who up until now didn’t have healthcare premiums to pay? How about the billions of dollars in premium increases that will have to be paid under this new law so that 70-year-old women have reproductive care? This doesn’t even take into account the loss of income that millions of Americans will experience when their jobs are cut back to part-time status to avoid the law. Forbes recently reported that instead of the $2500 per family decrease in healthcare spending Obama care will provide the real number appears to be an increase of $7450 for a typical family of four each year. Every dollar that is spent on healthcare premiums is another dollar that isn’t being spent to stimulate the economy. In short over $1 trillion and possibly as much as $2 trillion will be extracted from the economy in the next 10 years at a time when it is barely limping along as it is. It’s far as I’m concerned the economic consequences are scarier than the health consequences of this huge new tax. Why is no one talking about this? Ohhhh… nevermind.


But didn’t Obama say that everyone’s premiums would go down? What aboout the $2,500 savings for a family of four that he ran for office on and sold this plan to a very skeptical nation with?

Is there anything or anyone more aggravating than a progressive/liberal/democrat who has just been given some new statistic, clever phrase or mind numbing mantra to repeat over and over as though they have just discovered the secrets of the universe? The latest misunderstood statistic that I have read/heard at least 100 times in the last few days has centered around some new poll that apparently has the post Harry Reid Shutdown Tea Party favored by less than 15% of Americans which brings on statements like:

 “When are you guys going to figure it out …you Tea Baggers have a much lower approval rating than even congress …and not even half of President Obama’s approval rating, face it,  the  American people have rejected the Koch brothers owned tea party and everything they stand for”


“The Tea Baggers are treasonous traitors who should all be tried for the crimes they have committed against the USA

The vitriol from the left has been turned up all the way in the wake of the government shutdown and the smearing of the Tea Party congressmen and the GOP who kept their word and took off their gloves to fight for the people they represent.

I will freely admit that the democrats and their allies in the corporate owned media have been extremely effective sullying and besmirching the “Tea Party” brand. This shouldn’t be a shocking revelation for too many people as over the years, smearing the people who don’t agree with their warped view of the world has become their stock in trade. Hell, Barack Obama has used this tactic to win every election he has ever won. When you can’t defend your policies on the battlefield of ideas, the only arrow left in your quiver is to attack, ridicule and smear those who can. That’s what they do, and that’s what they’ve always done

We can all recall the intense frustration the “Tea Party” movement caused our southpaw friends as they groped about aimlessly looking for someone to call its leader so they could dig up, or make up some dirt on that person and begin engaging in their tried and true politics of personal destruction. The only problem was …as hard as they tried …they couldn’t identify one.  With no formal structure and no clear cut leader to go to work on….they were left with only one viable target and that was the Tea Party brand itself.  Over time being called a “teabagger’ became a pejorative they used whenever possible.

Trying to explain things like values and bright line absolutes (like right and wrong) to a liberal is like trying to teach Shakespeare to 2nd graders in Chinese, or trying to describe the colors of a rainbow to someone who has spent their entire life unable to see. Liberals don’t understand ‘values’ because they have never had any they weren’t willing to sell out or modify at the drop of a hat whenever they became inconvenient.  They tend to only think in terms of ideals based upon wishful thinking, emotions and feelings like “gee wouldn’t it be great if…”  If they were capable of understanding these concepts they would have realized that what the Tea Party represented was a set of core values that centered on a deep respect for our founding documents and the principles of small government, lower taxes, and personal and fiscal responsibility. In other words, the same set of principles and values that made this country the envy and leader of the world. Scary stuff.

In their desperate frenzy to silence all opposing views the left has told more lies about what the Tea Party really stands for than any other popular movement I have ever encountered. Since 2009 there are very few horrific high crimes, misdemeanors, evil motives, conspiracies and anti-government plots the tea party hasn’t been accused of.  The predictable result of this 4-5 year left wing assault has left the Tea Party brand and image in a shambles as evidenced by the low approval ratings they are so fond of misquoting.  Unfortunately, what the mudslinging rhetoric and over the top slandering hasn’t been able to do is to change the bright line between right and wrong. While the American people may tell you that they don’t approve of the “Tea Party” per se, they are still solidly in favor of the Tea Party values.  All of lying and bashing of the “Tea Party” in the world can’t make running trillion dollar plus deficits every year OK, or a government takeover of 1/6 of the economy OK, or things like NSA spying on us and recording all of our emails, text messages and phone calls OK. The leftwing MSM can cause people to reject the Tea Party but it can’t effectively make them reject their own common sense values.

So knock yourself out throwing everything you have at the “Tea Party” …we understand that it’s easier than openly advocating for higher taxes, larger government, more government involvement in our lives and the steady erosion of our freedoms and liberties we seem to experience whenever the tolerant left is in charge. Keep knocking yourselves out assaulting the ‘brand’ because people elect people whose views resonate with their own. The left wins elections by lying to the American people to make up for this fact. In the end their platform of large government, less freedom will be seen for what it is and the reason’s this model of governance has failed everywhere it has been tried will become evident.

In the meantime If you want to see a party in decline who’s own narcissism won’t let them admit it …take a look at the Democrat party …once the ACA /Obamacare tax burden becomes known to the millions of people it affects …democrats will be radioactive and virtually unelectable (except in Multnomah county) for the next 50 years…victims of their own bad ideas and bankrupt policies

On radio this morning, Glenn read another email he received from “The Forgotten Man”: Here is another installment from the forgotten man:



The Forgotten Man


The Republicans caved as I expected, but that’s not news where I live. As the discussions were going on in Washington this week, I called my senator and I called my congressmen too. I left them a message with my phone number and my e-mail address. I asked them to stand tall, to get the spending in order, to make Obamacare equal for all Americans, not just special interests. The recording that I received said they would send me a response. I’ve called them before, got the same recording. I won’t hear from them. After all, I’m The Forgotten Man.

The media today is blaming the TEA Party for all the ills in Washington. I laugh when I hear that, Glenn. Just give me 10 minutes with each of those so-called journalists, just 10 minutes. I’d ask them, “What is the TEA Party? How did the TEA Party get started? What do people who support the TEA Party principles actually believe in?” I can guarantee you, Glenn, they don’t know the answers. But I would share it with them anyway. We believe in liberty. We believe in freedom. We believe in a much smaller representative government. We believe in the God-given right that has been given to each individual. And then I’d ask those journalists, “When you give your daughter her allowance on Saturday and she comes back to you the next Wednesday saying she spent it all, and more, what do you tell her?” If they reply, “Well, you’re going to have to wait until next Saturday and you’re going to have to work it out,” I’d tell those journalists, “Welcome to the TEA Party.” If I met somebody in Hollywood and I asked them, “Why do you use Toronto to depict New York City in their recent movie,” and they told me, “Well, it’s cheaper to do it there,” I’d say, “My gosh, you sound like not only a capitalist but a new member of the TEA Party.” I’d ask them if they believe that every man, woman, and child should be treated equally, regardless of their gender, race, or religion. They would all say, in their journalistic ivory towers, “Of course.” And I would say, “Welcome to the TEA Party.”



You see, where I live, Glenn, using common sense, sharing common values, and exhibiting common courtesy is not the exception. It’s the norm. But I’m The Forgotten Man. And speaking of parties, maybe it is time for a third one. But not for the so-called journalists I see on TV because they already have enough parties. That’s why I don’t think they ask any that you had probing questions. In April I was watching the White House Correspondents Dinner on C-Span. Before it got started, they showed the journalists arriving. I thought I was watching the Academy Awards. Designer dresses, tuxedos, limousines. As each one entered, the flash bulbs would go off. Then they would stop, smile, turn slightly to the right. More flash bulbs, slightly shifting to the left, more pictures. I thought to myself, they’re not journalists; they’re the Kardashians. And it’s the same thing when the Washington Post or the New York Times or Vanity Fair throws a party. They will sell their souls to be there. But they don’t really have any souls to sell because they’ve already sold them before. If you work in the media in Washington or in New York or in Hollywood, I guess you have a decision to make: You can ask the tough questions that Americans actually would support you on, actually expect you to ask, or you can ask the “I want an invitation to the next party” question.



Glenn, I’m through with all of them, but I want you to know I’m also through with complaining. Misery loves company, but I’m kicking misery to the curb. The next time I write to ya, I’m going to focus on what’s good, on what’s possible, what’s remarkable about America. I may be The Forgotten Man, but I haven’t forgotten about America. You say this all the time, “We’ll get through this.” We will. Just wait and see. Much the sun is always brightest right after the storm.

– The Forgotten Man

“The Forgotten Man is in the 49 other states today that didn’t get $2 billion job project for Mitch McConnell. That’s who The Forgotten Man is. They took your money because, see, Mitch McConnell needs to be reelected. Now Mitch McConnell will say, ‘I had nothing to do with that,’” Glenn explained. “I know. I know. I know. Was it Dianne Feinstein? She’s so great. You know how much she loves to build dams and dam up rivers. You know, they all love that in California.”

Read More of this HERE (Click)

Lies, Damn Lies and the Liars Who Tell Them and their King …Obama!

by Cameron E. Jordan

Greetings world! …I discovered what it takes to make me feel like writing my own analysis of recent events …something so infuriating and dishonest that it boggles the mind …that’s what. Please repost this or a link to it or to some other article on this fraud so that the word goes out both far and wide… To do nothing is to accept that you are easily mis-led sheep and a tacit acceptance of the ‘idiot’ brand that Obama and Axelrod and the reast of the “fraud squad” have burned into your brain.

Only someone with a single digit IQ won’t immediately see through this latest desperate bit of manufactured news courtesy of the most dishonest despot in the history of our Republic. What am I talking about? Why the latest unemployment numbers of course…Let’s have a closer look at those numbers and I will show you what I mean.

Let me start by giving you some foundational background
For the last year the private sector has been adding an average of 134,000 jobs per month. In September, the number of new private jobs added was 114,000. So you are no doubt thinking:

“Jeez Cameron how did the jobless rate go down under 8% with numbers so low that we aren’t even keeping up with the expansion of the labor force?”

The short answer is this: Obama just got his ass handed to him by Romney in this weeks debate …it’s all anyone is talking about and since he can’t manufacture another fake assassination or some other manly show of testosterone to distract us he does the next best thing. The news media and all of the pundits routinely remind us that no sitting President has ever been re-elected with the unemployment rate over 8% …We know it …they know it …Axelfraud knows it and therefore so does Obama.


With that in mind hang on to your new green cards folks because you won’t believe the month we just had … according to the BLS, during September over 800,000 (yes, eight hundred thousand) “respondents” (phone survey by BLS) suddenly now report themselves as being “employed”. This number consists of “respondents” who report that they are now working “for themselves”. You know, selling knick knacks and paddy whacks on E-Bay, mowing lawns for their neighbors, etc. Essentially, during September, 800,000 folks started their own “new businesses”. (yes eight hundred freaking thousand) In statistics we call numbers that fall outside the normal distribution ‘outliers’ …but that is being much too kind because technically an “outlier” is any data point more than 1.5 interquartile ranges (IQRs) below the first quartile or above the third quartile. (***See example illustration below) anything that falls outside of the outlier zone those of us in statistics just call those “liars” and that is what we are dealing with here…only in this example that liar has a name and that name is Obama.


I am not criticizing people for taking the initiative and doing what they can to generate some cash flow by starting their own new businesses. If you haven’t figured it out already …here is the rub: People have been doing this for all of the last 48 months…every month, and in fact they do it more during the summer months than any other… The difference between September and previous months? For the preceding twelve months, these “new business jobs created” have averaged around 45,000 per month. But in September, this number explodes to 800,000??? So let’s keep this simple by whacking off some zeros so that 45,000 jobs = 4.5 etc. and see where this incredible new number falls into our data set shall we?


For the data 2 (20,000 of these home jobs), 5 (50,000 etc.), 6, 9, and 12 (120,000 jobs) for the months leading up to September we have the following five-number summary:
Minimum = 2
First quartile = 3.5
Median = 6
Third quartile = 10.5
Maximum = 12
IQR = 10.5 – 3.5 = 7, so 1.5•IQR = 10.5.

To determine if there are outliers you must consider the numbers that are 1.5•IQR or 10.5 beyond the quartiles.

First quartile – 1.5•IQR = 3.5 – 10.5 = –7
Third quartile + 1.5•IQR = 10.5 + 10.5 = 21

Since none of the data are outside the interval from –7 to 21, there are no outliers. Now Plug 800,000 new jobs in September into this mix…(or 80) and you get ….Holy Guacamole!!! These numbers aren’t just cooked, they defy my ability to fantasize! This type of an outlier is always disregarded because when performing least squares fitting** to data, it is often best to discard them before computing the line of best fit.
Further proof that the crooked propagandists in the MSM are in the bag for the commie will infuriate you because all they are going to announce is that:


They will not report the fraudulent methodology and underpinnings behind this number..they won’t report that the odds of you winning the lottery are better than this actually happening in September in this economy and they won’t shine the bright light they are supposed too shine on this cheap 2 bit huckster…constitutional fraud and charlatan shoveling the BS at us like we all rode the short buses to school. It’s wrong …it’s a lie …it’s insulting but it is the reality of who this man and his people are.
If voters do not recognize the “amazing good luck” these numbers represent for Barack Obama and the Democrats, 2 days after the biblical ass kicking he took on international TV and one month before the election, we must be at least as dumb as Obama proved himself to be in his debate this week.


Of all the dishonesty associated with the Obama Administration, and there has been a mountain of that already exposed, this one rises to an all-time new high in deceit and dishonesty. We will find out in four weeks if the American electorate, with the complicity of the MSM, is as stupid as Obama thinks…or if, as I suggest, Americans are far more intelligent and informed than Obama gives them credit for. If Obama continues to get away with this kind of lying then there really isn’t anything he won’t do and when the black choppers come looking for you and me and the rest of the people who believe in the experiment called America then the first people who should swing at the end of our ropes should be the members of the media who failed in their duties as the 5th estate.

The Car Guyz

Auto Industry Experts Playing for the Other Team ...You!

FOX News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The Rush Limbaugh Show

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Breitbart News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Drudge Retort

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Fathers' Rights Blog

by Jeffery M. Leving


Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The Blog

The latest news on and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: