Archive

Ethics

ISIS is a Hillary Clinton State Department creation.

Did you know that beyond the fundamantalism of their Wahhabi creed they are a mercenary army? That they are being paid salaries and being armed by our regional allies?

The failed state of Libya – now a breeding ground for ISIS and a jump off point for the influx of war-refugees into the EU – is not a Hillary Clinton/Obama feature?!

xvjq8

Hillary Clinton Is a Threat to All of Humanity

by James Corbett
grtv.ca
July 24, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Wall Street-backed warmonger whose potential election as President of the United States this November poses an existential threat not just to Americans but to all of humanity.

As First Lady and then as Senator, she actively supported the US’ illegal wars of aggression abroad:

BILL CLINTON: “Today, our Armed Forces joined our NATO allies in airstrikes against Serbian forces ,esponsible for the brutality in Kosovo.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “You know I voted for the Iraqi resolution.”

CLINTON: “The President understands this. He’s fully aware that it’s going to take a lot of patience and pain-staking planning and we’re gonna support him!”

CLINTON: “…including thousands of chemical weapons. Large volumes of chemical and biological stocks. A number of missiles and warheads. A major lab equipped to produce Anthrax.”

user812517_pic121694_1429026332

She not only admitted the US role in creating Al Qaeda:

CLINTON: “When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea there we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else, to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan.”

But then, despite this admission, as Secretary of State her support of the war on Libya and the jihadis in Syria directly led to the rise of ISIS and the migrant crisis in Europe:

CLINTON: “The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it’s time for Assad to get out of the way.”

“President Assad is not indispensable and we have absolutely nothing invested in him remaining in power.”

“I think based on definitions of war-criminal and crimes against humanity, there would be an argument to be made that he (Assad) would fit into that category.”

CLINTON: “Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”

CLINTON: “We came. We saw. He died! (laughter)”

Clinton_Corruption_6_479x750

She was the one who announced the US’ so-called “Asia-Pacific Pivot” that has seen more US forces being placed in the Asia-Pacific as a direct military threat to China:

CLINTON: “…and we look to the Asia-Pacific region, as we have for many decades, as an area where the United States in uniquely positioned to play a major role.”

CLINTON: “The United States is not seeding the Pacific to anyone.”

And she has stated in no uncertain terms that Russia and Iran will be militarily targeted in a Clinton presidency, and that the “nuclear option” is, as always, “on the table”:

CLINTON: “And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand, that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action.”

“There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken of the table. That has been my position consistently.”

CLINTON: “And Russia has to support the international community’s efforts sincerely or be held to account.”

CLINTON: “That Russia and China will pay a price. Because they are holding up progress, blockading it. That is no longer tolerable.”

c62b6dd5689d9566f50b01585dfb81c0

And unlike her many, many political statements of convenience that are merely a reflection of what is most politically acceptable at the moment:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?”

HILLARY CLINTON: “No.”

CHRIS MATTHEWS: “No … OK.”

CLINTON: “I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples.”

CLINTON: “I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York and I went to Wall Street and in December of 2007 before the big crash that we had. And I basically said ‘cut it out, quit foreclosing on homes. Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.’”

“Now who’s exactly the blame for the housing crisis? Now I think there’s plenty of blame to go around. Home-buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income, should of known that they were getting in over their heads.”

“I take a back-seat to no one when you look at my record on standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

“I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails.”

JAMES COMEY: “Lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

CLINTON: “So that the emails were immediately captured and preserved.”

COMEY: “There was no archiving at all of her emails.”

fd0831a00c3e8e4af06176187ce4b04d

…we can be assured that these threats of potential nuclear world war by Clinton are not idle threats. A future Clinton president would be assured of a like mind in the new Prime Minister in the UK, who has stated in no uncertain terms that she is willing to launch a nuclear strike that would kill hundreds of thousands:

GEORGE KEREVAN: “Let me congratulate the Prime Minster on her new rule, but can we cut to the chase? Is she personally prepared to authorize a nuclear-strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?”

THERESA MAY: “Yes. And I have to say to the honourable gentleman, the whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it.”

Hillary Clinton is a neocon, a war hawk, a liar, an unindicted criminal and a Wall Street puppet. Why is it, then, that those on the so-called “progressive” left who would be warning against her if she had an “R” next to her name are instead lecturing other leftists that it is now their duty to fall in line and help her get elected?

NOAM CHOMSKY: “If Clinton is nominated and it comes to a choice between Clinton and Trump, in a swing state, a state where it’s going to matter which way you vote, I would vote against Trump, and by elementary arithmetic, that means you hold your nose and you vote Democrat. I don’t think there’s any other rational choice. Abstaining from voting or, say, voting for, say, a candidate you prefer, a minority candidate, just amounts to a vote for Donald Trump, which I think is a devastating prospect, for reasons I’ve already mentioned.”

JUAN GONZALES: “We in SDS refused to vote. We wouldn’t support McCarthy. We wouldn’t support Humphrey. Our slogan was “Vote with your feet, vote in the street.” I’m—I’m here to tell you that the slogan was right, the tactic was wrong. And I think that the country, in retrospect, there would not have been a substantive change, there would have been a positive change, if Nixon had not been elected. But you learn from your mistakes. Hopefully, other generations learn from the mistakes of those who came before them.”

ELIZABETH WARREN: We’re all here today because we’re with her. And we’re going to work our hearts out to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States.

BERNIE SANDERS: “She will be the Democratic nominee for president, and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.”

ca34404e-a9ed-42bf-ba5e-359f86adf2ff-large16x9_landscape1467468715hillarycorrupt

The message here is as clear as it is predictable and disappointing. Once again those with the influence to shape these events and ignite a genuine protest movement against Hillary’s coronation at the Democratic National Convention are falling back into their roles as partisan ideologues, advocating for “their” candidate over the “other side,” taking the two-party system as a fait accomplis and complicity with that system as the only way forward.

But as Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca points out, this election is fundamentally different. This time, the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY: “In so many words Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy stance is ‘to blow up the planet.’ She has made statements to the effect that a first-strike nuclear attack against Russia or Iran is on the table. So that if she is in the White House she could in fact unleash the unspoken, which is World War 3. I think this is something we have to address both in terms of analysis and also political choice. That anyone who wants to blow up the planet is not ‘progressive.’

“Secondly, she has a criminal record. Not only in regards to the email scandal but also in relation to The Clinton Foundation, which is involved in fraud, money laundering, political cronyism, etc. It is amply documented.

“So that, in effect, the choice for the American people is to elect a war-criminal.”

0003h_-st-ny-hillary-clinton-table-woman-in-the-white-house-even-if-it-means

Too many people become attached to the personality of these political personas or fixated on the “D” or the “R” after their name. This clouds their judgement and stops them from seeing their policies and agenda for what they really are.

As Diana Johnstone, author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton points out, Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

DIANA JOHNSTONE: “I mean Hillary to me is not even an interesting person. She is simply a shallow, ambitious woman. Who has decided to make herself the instrument of the Washington think-tank persuasion and is using that too pose as a great expert on world affairs to be elected as President. She simply is the embodiment of all that is terrible in American foreign-policy that has developed over the past decades.”

It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world. It is incumbent on people of all stripes–American and non-American, Republican and Democrat, progressive and libertarian, anarchists, and those who have never thought about politics a day in their life–to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, work against her campaign for President, and avert the nuclear nightmare that is now coming into view.

The story continues here at its source (click here)72a26a5e1aa53908371a6684bed5888c

112114kingobama1

True to form the mainstream media has been doing its very best to keep the impact and reality of Obama’s immigration amnesty, power grab under wraps. DON’T LET THEM DO IT! Stay on your congressmen every single day to put a stop to this lawless act. Not only is history on our side but we are in the majority (and it isn’t even close). I don’t know about you but I am sick and tired of congress not doing what we sent them there to do! Here are the stats all on one place! You may not realize that this is the most important battle for our way of life and our quality of life we have ever been faced with! Nothing will set this country back further than allowing this to happen against our will!

2014-02-05-ea60f6d8

62% of US voters oppose Obama’s amnesty plan via executive action. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)
24% now say Obama has the legal authority to change immigration policy without agreement from Congress. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)
26% per cent are in favor of Obama’s plan. (Rasmussen Polling, November 25, 2014)

75% of voters answering exit polls in the 2014 Midterm elections Reject Obama’s Executive decree amnesty plans and

80% did not Want Foreign Workers Taking Jobs from Americans. .” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)

74% of voters believed that “President Obama should work with Congress rather than around Congress on immigration and separately. .” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)
“Voters overwhelmingly prefer an immigration system that protects American workers,” the polling memo states. “Therefore members of Congress should feel confident that voters will support actions using the power of the purse to protect American workers from Obama’s executive amnesty threat.” (Kellyanne Conway’s The Polling Company, Election Day November 4, 2014)

590x421xPoaching-590.jpg.pagespeed.ic.joxnjUrvea

90% of Americans Believe Illegal Immigration Serious Problem and most Want Expedited Deportations! (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

67% of respondents felt that illegal immigration was an “extremely” serious or “very serious” problem.

Another 22% felt it was a “somewhat serious” problem, while 10% said it was “not too/at all serious.” A majority of respondents said that illegal immigrant juveniles fleeing violence should not be given refugee status and feel the law should be changed so those not from Mexico and Canada can be more quickly deported. (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

Crazy_Border

64% of Americans believe “things in the U.S. feel like they are out of control right now and expressed mounting alarm about illegal immigration, . (Politico, October 20, 2014)
Nearly two-thirds of likely voters in battleground races this fall disapprove of President Barack Obama’s handling of immigration which should serve as a dire warning to Republicans like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Marco Rubio, and other Republicans trying to help Obama pass amnesty. (Politico, October 20, 2014)

Nearly Two Thirds of Oregon Voters ‘Likely’ to Reject Driver’s Licenses for Illegals by rejecting Measure 88 on the Nov 4 ballot in Oregon, but illegal alien supporters are spending massive amounts of money to trick voters into supporting it instead!
61% of likely voters were opposed to Measure 88. 53% said they were “certain” to oppose the measure while another 8% said they were opposed to it but “may change mind.” 26% of Oregon voters said they supported giving driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants while 5% said they supported the measure but “may change mind.” (Oregon Public Broadcasting Poll, October 8-11, 2014)

THE LATEST DEMOCRAT VOTE DRIVE, OBAMACARTOON
63% of Hispanics and 57% of Blacks say the government is not doing enough to enforce U.S. immigration laws and 78% of Whites and 74% of all respondents want tighter border security! (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)
71% of Blacks and 63% of Hispanics believe the government “has a responsibility” to protect job-hungry Americans “from competition with illegal immigrants.” (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

About three-quarters of Whites (77%) and all respondents (74%) agree that the government has a duty to protect Americans from job competition by illegal aliens. (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

111714

71% of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, say that illegal immigrant newcomers should NOT receive government benefits! Only 16% think “they are entitled to government aid” while 13% are undecided. A strong majority (68%) also “say the new illegal immigrants should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have,” and that includes a plurality–and a near-majority–of Democrats (49%). The poll found that “89% of GOP voters and 70% of unaffiliated’s think illegals should not have the same legal rights and protections that U.S. citizens have! (Rasmussen Polling, October 1, 2014)

Gallup poll recently found that 65% of Americans disapprove Barack Obama’s handling of immigration while

68% opposed Obama’s handling of illegal immigration in an Associated Press-GfK poll. A recent Reuters poll found that

The-Path-To-Citizenship-Cartoon

70% of Americans believe illegal immigrants “threaten traditional U.S. beliefs and customs” while

63% felt that “immigrants place a burden on the economy.” And a Polling Company poll that found that a majority of Americans wanted fewer immigrants at this time found that
“90% of likely voters feel that “U.S.- born workers and legal immigrants already here should get first preference for jobs.” (Pew, Gallup, USA Today, and Press-GfK polls, August, 2014)

63% of all Americans oppose work permits for illegal immigrants!

63% opposed while only 34% approved.

The poll also found that 73% of Americans, including 78% of independents, 54% of Democrats, and 80% of young people, would rather have Obama work with Congress instead of going it alone. (Investors Business Daily/TIPP Poll August 23-34, 2014)

www.usnews.com

8 of 10 evangelicals reject clergy’s push for amnesty; 29% want border closed to future immigration, and 73 percent, said that, instead of bringing in more immigrant workers, employers should be ‘required to try harder to recruit and train, Americans from those high-unemployment groups. And most evangelicals, 68 percent, said they are willing to pay higher prices if it is necessary for employers to raise wages to fill jobs with Americans instead of adding more foreign workers. 75 percent chose that “nations have a moral and sovereign right to decide which and how many immigrants can enter.” just 12 percent of 1,000 likely evangelical voters believe that the Old Testament verses on the “stranger among us” mean the government should give work permits and legal status to illegal immigrants. according to (Pulse Opinion Research — February 23, 2014)
71% of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, say that illegal immigrant newcomers should NOT receive government benefits!”90% of likely voters feel that “U.S.- born workers and legal immigrants already here should get first preference for jobs.” (Pew, Gallup, USA Today, and Press-GfK polls, August, 2014)
71% of Blacks and 63% of Hispanics believe the government “has a responsibility” to protect job-hungry Americans “from competition with illegal immigrants.” (The Polling Company, Inc., August 20, 2014)

111714

90% of Americans Believe Illegal Immigration Serious Problem and most Want Expedited
Deportations! (Associated Press Polling, July 24-28, 2014)

Any Question?

 

527776_227448464060253_423137336_n

Many of you will remember an article I posted a while back about the “IRP-6” who had become the latest victims of a very corrupt judge in our very corrupt legal system. This judge ultimately sentenced 6 innocent men to prison terms ranging from 87 to 135 months for crimes they didn’t commit. These men appealed their convictions and not surprisingly the pages of the transcript containing the judges most heinous reversible errors had been lost and no copies of the transcript could be found…I could not make this up. Their appeal has gained some much needed notoriety and with it some additional traction by the investigation and opinions being voiced by retired federal court Judge H Lee Sarokin …most prominently remembered as the Judge who overturned the conviction of Rubin “Hurricane” Carter back in the 80’s.H. Lee Sarokin served on the United States District Court (N.J.) appointed by President Carter, and the United States Court of Appeals (3rd Cir.) appointed by President Clinton. He retired in 1996 after 17 years on the federal bench and now resides in Rancho Santa Fe, CA. Here is his thinking on the IRP-6 appeal …. and Let’s Hope He is Right!! (sorry to link you to the Huffpo)

PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO DIG INTO THIS CASE AND THEN TO DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO SUPPORT THESE GUYS WHO HAVE BEEN LOCKED UP FOR WAY TOO LONG ALREADY …DO FOR THEM WHAT YOU WOULD WANT SOMEONE TO DO FOR YOU IF YOU WERE IN THEIR SHOES!!

images

 Judge H. Lee Sarokin – Speaks Out on Missing Transcript Needed for Appeal in IRP6 case in Colorado

Defendants in a Colorado case, United States of America v. Banks et al., claim, in addition to asserting their innocence, that their Fifth Amendment rights were violated when the trial judge compelled them to testify. Following a jury trial, all six defendants (five black and one white), known as the “IRP6,” were convicted of mail fraud or conspiracy, were sentenced to terms of imprisonment ranging from 87 to 135 months beginning in July 2012, and are presently incarcerated pending appeal. They represented themselves during the trial, and although they were aware of their right against self-incrimination (and named themselves on a potential witness list), they contend that the judge compelled waiver of that right. Apparently the judge was frustrated by their failure to produce witnesses in a timely fashion, and they claim the judge said something that led them to believe that at least one of them had to testify in order to keep their defense open. The case is now on appeal. Usually out of deference to the circuit court handling the matter, I would not comment. However, there is one aspect of the case that intrigues me, and since the matter has been pending for a considerable period while the defendants languish in prison, I thought some general airing might be appropriate.

IRP6

Resolving the issue should be a no-brainer, right? Look or listen to the transcript; read or hear what the judge said and decide whether or not the defendants reasonably concluded that at least one of them had to testify. But here’s the rub. There apparently is no record or transcript of the conversation available to either the defendants or the appellate court. The advocates for the defendants (a-justcause.com), who have asked me to review and comment on this matter, claim that efforts to obtain the record of the conversation between the judge and the defendants on this issue have been met variously with claims that there is no record (the reporter missed the conversation), that it exists but is missing, that it existed but has been destroyed, or that “we have it but won’t turn it over.” They also claim that all informal and formal attempts to obtain that critical exchange between the court and the defendants have been denied either by the court reporter or the court. They advise that the relief was even denied in a separate civil suit brought against the reporter for the turnover of the transcript.

petition2

Because there is always a danger in these matters of hearing one side, I insisted that I be furnished with the government’s version of what transpired in this disputed exchange. The government’s brief (U.S. Answering Brief) summarily dismisses the claim by stating, “Because nothing in the record other than the defendants’ own self-serving assertions supports their claims of compulsion, the exact language used by the district court during the sidebar conference is immaterial” (emphasis mine). Roughly translated, the statement should read, “There is nothing to support the defendants’ position on the record, because there is no record.” It is an obvious concession by the government that the record before the court of appeals does not contain evidence of what the trial judge said to the defendants — which they claim caused them to believe that they had to testify or be foreclosed from proceeding with their case.

the-6-300x127

Although the defendants vehemently proclaim their innocence, I do not have sufficient information to comment on their convictions. But I have no doubt that whether or not they felt compelled to testify depends exclusively on what the judge said to them at that precise moment. To suggest that the court’s “exact language” is immaterial is ludicrous, particularly since the court and the defendants disagree as to what was said. CONT’D HERE

Don’t forget Part II Here The Missing Transcript Case Becomes More Curious —

and Part III Here –   “The Case of the Missing Transcript Solved!”

 

JuryNullificationBlimp_smaller

Jury Nullification: Why Every American Needs to Learn This Taboo Verdict

Sunday, 25 May 2014 10:56 By Kevin Mathews, Care2 | Op-Ed

Did you know that, no matter the evidence, if a jury feels a law is unjust, it is permitted to “nullify” the law rather than finding someone guilty? Basically, jury nullification is a jury’s way of saying, “By the letter of the law, the defendant is guilty, but we also disagree with that law, so we vote to not punish the accused.” Ultimately, the verdict serves as an acquittal.

imagesIJ2NECUM

Haven’t heard of jury nullification? Don’t feel bad; you’re far from alone. If anything, your unfamiliarity is by design. Generally, defense lawyers are not allowed to even mention jury nullification as a possibility during a trial because judges prefer juries to follow the general protocols rather than delivering independent verdicts.

Surprisingly, the Supreme Court has routinely agreed that judges have no obligation to inform juries about jury nullification. Paradoxically, jury nullification is permitted to exist as an option to all juries, yet this option cannot be discussed in most courtrooms.

A few years ago, Julian Heicklen handed out pamphlets to passersby on jury nullification to people outside of a federal courthouse. While the former professor was merely attempting to educate people about how the jury system works, he was charged with jury tampering. The prosecution labeled Heicklen “a significant and important threat to our judicial system,” but the judge ultimately disagreed and dismissed the case. Nonetheless, the fact that this case went to court at all shows how those in the legal system are willing to intimidate those who vocalize this loophole.

imagesS3A1991X

Jury nullification is undoubtedly feared because of its ability to upset the system. A jury that considers drug laws to be outrageous can nullify. A jury that is aware of the mass inequality in incarceration rates and believes a defendant was targeted via racial profiling can nullify. A jury that believes a harmless defendant is a victim of the prison industrial complex rather than a perpetrator can nullify. This counter-verdict exists so that citizens can right the wrongs inherent in our supposed “justice” system.

Of course, as the New York Times points out, jury nullification hasn’t always been used to “do good.” Historically, racist southern juries have nullified cases involving hate crimes and overly optimistic juries have nullified instances of police brutality, unwilling to fault police officers. However, if you agree that an informed jury can produce the correct verdict, nullification remains a valuable tool in the pursuit of justice.

CONTINUE THIS ARTICLE HERE AT THE SOURCE (CLICK)

jnn

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/23929-jury-nullification-why-every-american-needs-to-learn-this-taboo-verdict

Obama-Son-Roberts-SC

If you were like me and the rest of the clear thinking world then your jaw must have also hit the floor when you first heard that the Supreme Court of the United States of America had decided that Obamacare passed constitutional muster …as a tax? Then when you found out that it was Chief Justice Roberts who was the deciding vote you scratched your head and wondered how they got to him…did they threaten to kill him …or his wife …or his children? What did they have on Roberts? Well now we know…they threatened to take his adopted kids away because the adoption included some ‘extra-legal’ actions taken by Mr. Roberts… How does it make you feel to know that there is no one in the world who isn’t for sale? Roberts rode to Obamacares rescue again this week by refusing to hear a case that should have been a slam dunk for the anti obamacare crowd….Here is the Western Journalism story that tells us all about it.

JUSTICE FOR SALE…Why John Roberts (Likely) Is Protecting Obamacare…

On Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one), Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday, arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court (with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote), and it had originated in the Senate (the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate), the law was therefore unconstitutional; and implementation of Obamacare should at least be stayed pending further examination.

While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed, the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do anything to derail Obamacare, no matter what arguments against it are brought before him.

STORY CONTINUES HERE

http://www.westernjournalism.com/john-roberts-likely-protecting-obamacare/#!

obama_in_jail_answer_5_xlarge

A Chinese proverb says, “May you live in interesting times.” We certainly do. Historians will look back on this time as “the Obama criminal years.”

How lawless is the Obama administration? Many of the dirty deeds and scandals of Obama & Co. are public knowledge. Let’s start with the most astonishing.

Many citizens are aware that because of ObamaCare, millions of Americans are losing their health care coverage. Is this incompetence, or criminal fraud?

One thing is certain: it would be fraud if a private sector CEO knew that millions of customers would lose their insurance, yet repeated the same lie over and over — “If you like your health insurance, you can keep it. Period.”

Why would we not hold a politician to the same standard?

CONTINUED HERE

 

 

IRP66

I think it was Friedrich Nietzsche who said that “man is the cruelest animal ” and every year or so a story comes along that reminds you of just how true that statement is and man’s inhumanity to man and the evil that dwells inside some of us… When catalyzed by greed and narcississm …the need for revenge can be all-consuming, and the results …devastating.

As I was reading the other day I stumbled upon a story that piqued my interest enough to start digging into it to get the background and fact check the original story. The people who are the victims in this story have come to be called the “IRP6.” http://freetheirp6.wix.com/freetheirp6#!

6 men….strong and devout Christians all of themk, have had their lives rudely interrupted and taken from them by a corrupt criminal justice system with it’s hand on one side of the scales of justice …driven by greed and uncaring about the ruined lives it leaves in its wake.

“When crimes begin to pile up they become invisible. When sufferings become unendurable, the cries are no longer heard. The cries, too, fall like rain in summer.” – Bertolt Brecht

When you see an injustice such as this taking place in every person’s duty to shine a bright light on it and say enough is enough because any of us could be next. I will let you read about this for yourself that I strongly encourage you to take some affirmative step to support these six men who are currently scheduled to spend the next 10 to 11 years in prison for a crime they didn’t commit. Man’s inhumanity is truly the keynote of stupidity in power. At the heart of this corruption is a federal court judge and the law firm she used to work for and a sociopathic woman consumed with evil. It’s an interesting story and one that everybody needs to hear… So please help me with this and spread it to at least two other people… Remember you could be next.

THERE WILL BE FOLLOW UPS TO THIS …COUNT ON IT!

IRP6

HERE IS THE STORY

Beginning of IRP Solutions

IRP Solutions was established in February 2003 and began to heavily market its flagship Case Investigative Life Cycle (CILC®) software solution in August 2003 to major federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, including but not limited to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ) and the New York City Police Department (NYPD).

The Impact of 911

IRP Solutions Corporation was formed a couple of years after the tragedies of 9-11 (IRP is an acronym for “Investigative Resource Planning”). This was a country in shock. We experienced the worst attack in history against our country on our native soil. Many of the events of that day and months that would follow showed gaps in the investigative processes of our law enforcement agencies, but yet there were no solutions readily available to address the need. Meanwhile, years prior to 9-11 the founders of IRP Solutions had begun development of a small stand-alone software application to be used as an individual work product for law enforcement.

That initial work was done under the company name Leading Team. Although the initial software developed by Leading Team was an enterprise-class solution, it was not web-enabled or capable of addressing the major gaps that were identified post-911 (i.e., Lack of ability to share intelligence/investigative information between law enforcement at all levels of government, etc.). The company founders knew that with a little hard work, they could develop a software application that could significantly impact our nation’s law enforcement operations. However, they didn’t feel that the current company name accurately reflected the new strategy. Thus, IRP Solutions Corporation was formed.

The Call from DHS: A Dream Opportunity….

In October 2003, IRP received a call from the Program Manager at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for an initiative that was called the Consolidated Enforcement Environment Initiative. DHS wanted IRP to conduct a web demo of the software solution that IRP had developed. IRP’s web demo was very successful and the company was asked to travel to Washington, DC to conduct a demo before a larger audience.

In November 2003, IRP travelled to Washington, DC to demonstrate their software solution before the DHS Consolidated Enforcement Environment Initiative team which comprised of DHS, FBI, Secret Service, Federal Air Marshals, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, TSA, U.S. Coast Guard, and Deloitte. This audience questioned IRP on the technical and functional aspects of the software. This was, yet another, successful demonstration of the software that IRP had developed.  Following the meeting, DHS provided IRP with “Eyes Only” documentation and asked IRP to begin working (non-contractually) on capabilities to meet certain federal law enforcement scenarios.

IRP Solutions’ Case Investigative Life Cycle (CILC®)

Although CILC software was considered the most promising, strong political winds from large entrenched competitors significantly slowed the sales cycle, which subsequently caused a cash flow crunch and aging debt related to the development of the software.

The RAID….The IRP Dream Becomes A Nightmare…February 9, 2005

The morning of February 9th, 2005 started like most days at IRP Solutions. Company staff began to show up for work. The day was a typical business day until unexpected guest showed up at the reception desk. IRP Solutions was being raided by federal agents for alleged wrongdoing. There were 21 federal agents at the front door of a business, that at the time, only had approximately 20 employees. A warrant was presented stating that IRP Solutions and its executives were accused of mail and wire fraud.

Let’s rewind a couple of years and set the stage for how all of this came about…..

In 2003, IRP Solutions (IRP) was established to develop software for law enforcement agencies. Through its marketing efforts, IRP became engaged with major agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As IRP became more engaged with agencies like DHS and NYPD, there were more requests for modifications to the software. DHS even told IRP to “…put a federal face on the software…”. Agencies were sending very positive signals and continued to ask for modifications to the software to meet their respective needs. Because of the modification and customization requests from agencies, IRP management began to explore ways to meet the increased demand for software development. IRP began to explore the option of augmenting the staff with contract labor.

IRP contacted staffing companies and explained the dilemma of trying to meet the requests of the law enforcement agencies. Several companies did their due diligence and considered IRP an acceptable risk for executing a contract. There were several companies that chose not to team with IRP. Contracts were executed to bring on technologists to incorporate technical enhancements requested by the federal government and local law enforcement. The agencies were fully engaged with IRP to make enhancements to the software, which resulted in the need for IRP to continue extending its engagement with staffing companies. Consequently, the debt continued to grow.

In the meantime, in late 2004, DHS requested pricing quotes that exceeded $100 million. Additionally, DHS explicitly stated that they were working on the budget and needed the pricing quotes as part of their budget exercises. This was later substantiated by FBI interview documents in which a DHS official stated that they (DHS) were setting up a pilot project for IRP.

Now fast forward to February 2005…IRP business offices are raided by over 20 federal agents for alleged fraud and running a scam, accused of not developing software, but bilking staffing companies of millions of dollars. IRP was also accused of making up stories about customers like the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, NYPD, Colorado Bureau of Investigations, and several others.

There was no fraud or scheme…IRP Solutions was a legitimate business that incurred business debt.

A grand jury handed down a 25-count indictment in June 2009, charging the six with fraud in never paying $4 million or more the company owed to about 40 companies that provided temporary labor to IRP.

Dupree said, “The Christian businessmen built a small company that concentrated on developing a software application called CILC, which stands for Case Investigative Life Cycle. This software was developed to aid law enforcement in investigating a case through to prosecution. The necessity of this type of software was overly clear as the government indicated the main reason 9/11 can occur was because of the inability of government agencies to share information.”

“In other words, the FBI alleged that IRP Solutions did not actually have software at all, “said Dupree

DON’T LEAVE NOW …THIS STORY CONTINUES HERE WITH (CLICK) THEN SCROLL DOWN A FEW PARAGRAPHS

HERE IS THE LINK TO THEIR WEBSITE WHERE YOU CAN DONATE MONEY AND/OR READ PRESS RELEASES, AND VIEW ACTUAL EVIDENCE …PEOPLE THIS THING STINKS ON ICE … PUT YOURSELF IN THEIR SHOES … 10 YEARS IN PRISON… WTF?CLICK

HERE FOR THE FREE THE IRP6 WEBSITE (CLICK)

THIS LINK WILL TAKE YOU TO A REALLY GOOD GRAPHIC SHOWING THE RELATIONSHIPS OF ALL OF THE BAD ACTORS

IRP663

The Car Guyz

Auto Industry Experts Playing for the Other Team ...You!

FOXNews.com

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The Rush Limbaugh Show

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Breitbart News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Drudge Retort

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Fathers' Rights Blog

by Jeffery M. Leving

therightwingextremist

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: