Archive

The Corrupt Democrat Party

  

7UU

It has been revealed by a whistleblower who happens to be extremely high ranking at the NSA that the previously reported Russian hacked DNC emails were actually leaked internally by somebody working for the Democratic Party!

Bill Binney, an agent at the NSA states that the DNC emails were transferred much too quickly and that it would have taken hackers much longer.

According To Zerohedge

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?

Assange-Russian-Hackers-01-600x280

Executive Summary

Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to incriminate Russia.

After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device, and that “telltale signs” implicating Russia were then inserted.

Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying and doctoring were performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].

Russia-Did-It

Independent analyst Skip Folden, a retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.

The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.

NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].

Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described “the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”

J67JH

Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2016).

From the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes:

-(1) an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2017, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and

-(2) a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”

o86,i,m

* * *

Mr. President:

This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U.S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why. For example, our first such memorandum, a same-day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech on March 5, 2003, warned that the “unintended consequences were likely to be catastrophic,” should the U.S. attack Iraq and “justfy” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda.

The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category. It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks.

The recent forensic findings mentioned above have put a huge dent in that assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The pundits and politicians who have led the charge against Russian “meddling” in the U.S. election can be expected to try to cast doubt on the forensic findings, if they ever do bubble up into the mainstream media. But the principles of physics don’t lie; and the technical limitations of today’s Internet are widely understood. We are prepared to answer any substantive challenges on their merits.

You may wish to ask CIA Director Mike Pompeo what he knows about this. Our own lengthy intelligence community experience suggests that it is possible that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber-warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid with their new director regarding how this all went down.

Copied, Not Hacked

As indicated above, the independent forensic work just completed focused on data copied (not hacked) by a shadowy persona named “Guccifer 2.0.” The forensics reflect what seems to have been a desperate effort to “blame the Russians” for publishing highly embarrassing DNC emails three days before the Democratic convention last July. Since the content of the DNC emails reeked of pro-Clinton bias, her campaign saw an overriding need to divert attention from content to provenance – as in, who “hacked” those DNC emails? The campaign was enthusiastically supported by a compliant “mainstream” media; they are still on a roll.

f

“The Russians” were the ideal culprit. And, after WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, “We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” her campaign had more than a month before the convention to insert its own “forensic facts” and prime the media pump to put the blame on “Russian meddling.” Mrs. Clinton’s PR chief Jennifer Palmieri has explained how she used golf carts to make the rounds at the convention. She wrote that her “mission was to get the press to focus on something even we found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”

Independent cyber-investigators have now completed the kind of forensic work that the intelligence assessment did not do. Oddly, the “hand-picked” intelligence analysts contented themselves with “assessing” this and “assessing” that. In contrast, the investigators dug deep and came up with verifiable evidence from metadata found in the record of the alleged Russian hack.

They found that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was not a hack, by Russia or anyone else. Rather it originated with a copy (onto an external storage device – a thumb drive, for example) by an insider. The data was leaked after being doctored with a cut-and-paste job to implicate Russia. We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer 2.0 is. You may wish to ask the FBI.

BammieSilentCoup1

The Time Sequence

June 12, 2016: Assange announces WikiLeaks is about to publish “emails related to Hillary Clinton.”

June 15, 2016: DNC contractor Crowdstrike, (with a dubious professional record and multiple conflicts of interest) announces that malware has been found on the DNC server and claims there is evidence it was injected by Russians.

June 15, 2016: On the same day, “Guccifer 2.0” affirms the DNC statement; claims responsibility for the “hack;” claims to be a WikiLeaks source; and posts a document that the forensics show was synthetically tainted with “Russian fingerprints.”

We do not think that the June 12 & 15 timing was pure coincidence. Rather, it suggests the start of a pre-emptive move to associate Russia with anything WikiLeaks might have been about to publish and to “show” that it came from a Russian hack.

imagesfrf

The Key Event

July 5, 2016: In the early evening, Eastern Daylight Time, someone working in the EDT time zone with a computer directly connected to the DNC server or DNC Local Area Network, copied 1,976 MegaBytes of data in 87 seconds onto an external storage device. That speed is many times faster than what is physically possible with a hack.

It thus appears that the purported “hack” of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 (the self-proclaimed WikiLeaks source) was not a hack by Russia or anyone else, but was rather a copy of DNC data onto an external storage device. Moreover, the forensics performed on the metadata reveal there was a subsequent synthetic insertion – a cut-and-paste job using a Russian template, with the clear aim of attributing the data to a “Russian hack.” This was all performed in the East Coast time zone.

“Obfuscation & De-obfuscation”

Mr. President, the disclosure described below may be related. Even if it is not, it is something we think you should be made aware of in this general connection. On March 7, 2017, WikiLeaks began to publish a trove of original CIA documents that WikiLeaks labeled “Vault 7.” WikiLeaks said it got the trove from a current or former CIA contractor and described it as comparable in scale and significance to the information Edward Snowden gave to reporters in 2013.

No one has challenged the authenticity of the original documents of Vault 7, which disclosed a vast array of cyber warfare tools developed, probably with help from NSA, by CIA’s Engineering Development Group. That Group was part of the sprawling CIA Directorate of Digital Innovation – a growth industry established by John Brennan in 2015.

Scarcely imaginable digital tools – that can take control of your car and make it race over 100 mph, for example, or can enable remote spying through a TV – were described and duly reported in the New York Times and other media throughout March. But the Vault 7, part 3 release on March 31 that exposed the “Marble Framework” program apparently was judged too delicate to qualify as “news fit to print” and was kept out of the Times.

g5gr

The Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima, it seems, “did not get the memo” in time. Her March 31 article bore the catching (and accurate) headline: “WikiLeaks’ latest release of CIA cyber-tools could blow the cover on agency hacking operations.”

The WikiLeaks release indicated that Marble was designed for flexible and easy-to-use “obfuscation,” and that Marble source code includes a “deobfuscator” to reverse CIA text obfuscation.

More important, the CIA reportedly used Marble during 2016. In her Washington Post report, Nakashima left that out, but did include another significant point made by WikiLeaks; namely, that the obfuscation tool could be used to conduct a “forensic attribution double game” or false-flag operation because it included test samples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi.

The CIA’s reaction was neuralgic. Director Mike Pompeo lashed out two weeks later, calling Assange and his associates “demons,” and insisting, “It’s time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service, often abetted by state actors like Russia.”

Mr. President, we do not know if CIA’s Marble Framework, or tools like it, played some kind of role in the campaign to blame Russia for hacking the DNC. Nor do we know how candid the denizens of CIA’s Digital Innovation Directorate have been with you and with Director Pompeo. These are areas that might profit from early White House review. 

 

SCROLL DOWN TO “PUTIN ….” AFTER YOU TAKE THIS LINK

ARTICLE CONTINUES HERE AT AMERICAN TRUTH SEEKERS 

ats-logo-284x300

Advertisements

To say that Barack Obama is an ideologue isn’t going to make national news at this point, that much is a given. Anyone with a pulse and an IQ over 6 has known that since before Obama took office in 2008, and even most liberals not registering any brain activity would have admitted as much once Obama secured his re-election in the 2012 election. It’s also not major news to say that Obama and his administration have been the most corrupt administration in recent memory, or that they subscribe to the philosophy of, “The ends justify the means,” the Constitution be damned…

0003h_-st-ny-hillary-clinton-table-woman-in-the-white-house-even-if-it-means

With all that said, if recent weeks have shown us anything at all, they have shown us that Hillary Clinton is infinitely more corrupt than Obama, even more of a sociopath, not to mention a stone-cold killer when you consider that FIVE of her political enemies died from very strange and mysterious deaths in the last SIX weeks alone, making the number of dead former Clinton associates totaling 67 people. Coincidences? Hardly! Well, it gets worse…

146ocf

Realtruenews.org reports:

Following the conventions, a pattern has emerged from the polling: Donald Trump has taken a commanding lead in all demographics. From the well to poorly educated and even out-performing Romney among women and Hispanics. According polling aggregates the only demographic Hillary is winning is African American single women and White College Males with advanced degrees in Social Sciences.

If that’s the case, then how is Hillary Clinton leading in all the polls considering THIS was the scene at the Democrat National Convention (below) WHILE Hillary was speaking (if you listen you can hear her)?

 

 

ISIS is a Hillary Clinton State Department creation.

Did you know that beyond the fundamantalism of their Wahhabi creed they are a mercenary army? That they are being paid salaries and being armed by our regional allies?

The failed state of Libya – now a breeding ground for ISIS and a jump off point for the influx of war-refugees into the EU – is not a Hillary Clinton/Obama feature?!

xvjq8

Hillary Clinton Is a Threat to All of Humanity

by James Corbett
grtv.ca
July 24, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Wall Street-backed warmonger whose potential election as President of the United States this November poses an existential threat not just to Americans but to all of humanity.

As First Lady and then as Senator, she actively supported the US’ illegal wars of aggression abroad:

BILL CLINTON: “Today, our Armed Forces joined our NATO allies in airstrikes against Serbian forces ,esponsible for the brutality in Kosovo.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “You know I voted for the Iraqi resolution.”

CLINTON: “The President understands this. He’s fully aware that it’s going to take a lot of patience and pain-staking planning and we’re gonna support him!”

CLINTON: “…including thousands of chemical weapons. Large volumes of chemical and biological stocks. A number of missiles and warheads. A major lab equipped to produce Anthrax.”

user812517_pic121694_1429026332

She not only admitted the US role in creating Al Qaeda:

CLINTON: “When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea there we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else, to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan.”

But then, despite this admission, as Secretary of State her support of the war on Libya and the jihadis in Syria directly led to the rise of ISIS and the migrant crisis in Europe:

CLINTON: “The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it’s time for Assad to get out of the way.”

“President Assad is not indispensable and we have absolutely nothing invested in him remaining in power.”

“I think based on definitions of war-criminal and crimes against humanity, there would be an argument to be made that he (Assad) would fit into that category.”

CLINTON: “Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”

CLINTON: “We came. We saw. He died! (laughter)”

Clinton_Corruption_6_479x750

She was the one who announced the US’ so-called “Asia-Pacific Pivot” that has seen more US forces being placed in the Asia-Pacific as a direct military threat to China:

CLINTON: “…and we look to the Asia-Pacific region, as we have for many decades, as an area where the United States in uniquely positioned to play a major role.”

CLINTON: “The United States is not seeding the Pacific to anyone.”

And she has stated in no uncertain terms that Russia and Iran will be militarily targeted in a Clinton presidency, and that the “nuclear option” is, as always, “on the table”:

CLINTON: “And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand, that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action.”

“There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken of the table. That has been my position consistently.”

CLINTON: “And Russia has to support the international community’s efforts sincerely or be held to account.”

CLINTON: “That Russia and China will pay a price. Because they are holding up progress, blockading it. That is no longer tolerable.”

c62b6dd5689d9566f50b01585dfb81c0

And unlike her many, many political statements of convenience that are merely a reflection of what is most politically acceptable at the moment:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?”

HILLARY CLINTON: “No.”

CHRIS MATTHEWS: “No … OK.”

CLINTON: “I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples.”

CLINTON: “I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York and I went to Wall Street and in December of 2007 before the big crash that we had. And I basically said ‘cut it out, quit foreclosing on homes. Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.’”

“Now who’s exactly the blame for the housing crisis? Now I think there’s plenty of blame to go around. Home-buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income, should of known that they were getting in over their heads.”

“I take a back-seat to no one when you look at my record on standing up and fighting for progressive values.”

“I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty.”

HILLARY CLINTON: “We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails.”

JAMES COMEY: “Lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

CLINTON: “So that the emails were immediately captured and preserved.”

COMEY: “There was no archiving at all of her emails.”

fd0831a00c3e8e4af06176187ce4b04d

…we can be assured that these threats of potential nuclear world war by Clinton are not idle threats. A future Clinton president would be assured of a like mind in the new Prime Minister in the UK, who has stated in no uncertain terms that she is willing to launch a nuclear strike that would kill hundreds of thousands:

GEORGE KEREVAN: “Let me congratulate the Prime Minster on her new rule, but can we cut to the chase? Is she personally prepared to authorize a nuclear-strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?”

THERESA MAY: “Yes. And I have to say to the honourable gentleman, the whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it.”

Hillary Clinton is a neocon, a war hawk, a liar, an unindicted criminal and a Wall Street puppet. Why is it, then, that those on the so-called “progressive” left who would be warning against her if she had an “R” next to her name are instead lecturing other leftists that it is now their duty to fall in line and help her get elected?

NOAM CHOMSKY: “If Clinton is nominated and it comes to a choice between Clinton and Trump, in a swing state, a state where it’s going to matter which way you vote, I would vote against Trump, and by elementary arithmetic, that means you hold your nose and you vote Democrat. I don’t think there’s any other rational choice. Abstaining from voting or, say, voting for, say, a candidate you prefer, a minority candidate, just amounts to a vote for Donald Trump, which I think is a devastating prospect, for reasons I’ve already mentioned.”

JUAN GONZALES: “We in SDS refused to vote. We wouldn’t support McCarthy. We wouldn’t support Humphrey. Our slogan was “Vote with your feet, vote in the street.” I’m—I’m here to tell you that the slogan was right, the tactic was wrong. And I think that the country, in retrospect, there would not have been a substantive change, there would have been a positive change, if Nixon had not been elected. But you learn from your mistakes. Hopefully, other generations learn from the mistakes of those who came before them.”

ELIZABETH WARREN: We’re all here today because we’re with her. And we’re going to work our hearts out to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States.

BERNIE SANDERS: “She will be the Democratic nominee for president, and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.”

ca34404e-a9ed-42bf-ba5e-359f86adf2ff-large16x9_landscape1467468715hillarycorrupt

The message here is as clear as it is predictable and disappointing. Once again those with the influence to shape these events and ignite a genuine protest movement against Hillary’s coronation at the Democratic National Convention are falling back into their roles as partisan ideologues, advocating for “their” candidate over the “other side,” taking the two-party system as a fait accomplis and complicity with that system as the only way forward.

But as Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca points out, this election is fundamentally different. This time, the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY: “In so many words Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy stance is ‘to blow up the planet.’ She has made statements to the effect that a first-strike nuclear attack against Russia or Iran is on the table. So that if she is in the White House she could in fact unleash the unspoken, which is World War 3. I think this is something we have to address both in terms of analysis and also political choice. That anyone who wants to blow up the planet is not ‘progressive.’

“Secondly, she has a criminal record. Not only in regards to the email scandal but also in relation to The Clinton Foundation, which is involved in fraud, money laundering, political cronyism, etc. It is amply documented.

“So that, in effect, the choice for the American people is to elect a war-criminal.”

0003h_-st-ny-hillary-clinton-table-woman-in-the-white-house-even-if-it-means

Too many people become attached to the personality of these political personas or fixated on the “D” or the “R” after their name. This clouds their judgement and stops them from seeing their policies and agenda for what they really are.

As Diana Johnstone, author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton points out, Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

DIANA JOHNSTONE: “I mean Hillary to me is not even an interesting person. She is simply a shallow, ambitious woman. Who has decided to make herself the instrument of the Washington think-tank persuasion and is using that too pose as a great expert on world affairs to be elected as President. She simply is the embodiment of all that is terrible in American foreign-policy that has developed over the past decades.”

It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world. It is incumbent on people of all stripes–American and non-American, Republican and Democrat, progressive and libertarian, anarchists, and those who have never thought about politics a day in their life–to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, work against her campaign for President, and avert the nuclear nightmare that is now coming into view.

The story continues here at its source (click here)72a26a5e1aa53908371a6684bed5888c

O6

What to do when things no longer make sense?

By Elizabeth  November 28th, 2014

Lately I get this feeling that I am living in some alternate reality where nothing makes any sense. Representatives of the people no longer represent their wishes or values…the executive has put the best interests of the people he serves behind the party he belongs too and tens of millions of foreigners and grifters who have come to take down this once great country. Of course I am talking about Obama’s latest royal edict opening our borders to a flood of illegal aliens all looking for that free chicken in every pot…the free health care…the free section 8 housing…the free money from TANF…free child and day care… free food… free education…free tutors for their children …free band instruments …free everything! What’s happened to this country?

O4

“But Elizabeth,  Reagan and Bush did the same exact things where was your outrage then?”

Well for starters had I been alive …even just a toddler I would have been outraged. Secondly, there is no comparison between the two because Reagan and Bush were interpreting a law that congress had passed and Obama is acting alone because congress didn’t do what he wanted them to do … sorry, that’s not how it works in this country. BUT, while Reagan and Bush 41 provide no precedent for Obama’s illegal amnesty (by executive order), Hoover, Truman,  and Eisenhower do.

During The Great Depression, Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed work. Then, at the end of World War II, Truman deported over two million illegal aliens to ensure that returning veterans would find work. And again in 1954, Eisenhower deported 13 million Mexican Nationals! The program was called “Operation Wetback”. He did it so WWII and Korean Veterans would have a better chance to get a job and return to their former lives. Wait a minute… you mean that we deported Mexicans because they were taking jobs away from US Citizens who had been overseas at war and then when they started to return we sent them home so our legal citizens would have jobs? You mean we protected our own legal citizens first? What’s changed? It hasn’t been the values of a majority of Americans…what has changed are the values of the people running our government. If they could deport the illegal aliens to protect American jobs for American’s back then – they have 30-40 million good reasons to do it again now, along with the millions and millions of unemployed who would benefit. Sheeple, illegal aliens should be deported, not supported. We are a country of laws, that’s what makes us unique. What’s happened to this country? When things start to happen like this that don’t make sense and aren’t consistent with our values then the people have an obligation to speak up

OOThis should not be a Republican vs Democrat thing at all, and trust me when I tell you that the Republicans we just sent back to the majority in both houses will NOT do a thing to stop this other than give it lip service and pretend to be outraged. Republicans, like their Democrat friends “across the aisle” are hypocrites, and political whores. They want cheap labor and to drive down wages for financially crushed American families. They rubber stamp H1B Visas to make our college degrees worthless, they complain about Obama’s unconstitutional actions but secretly want this slave caste of illiterate workers who are used to abusive conditions with unfair pay. The Democrats also see this next wave of illegal aliens as the next voting block who’s votes they can buy with our tax dollars in order to keep themselves in power for the next 50 years until they figure out …like the blacks are figuring out now, that Democrats require a victim class to sell their class envy and bad policy ideas too and in the final analysis they will do nothing to improve their station in life.

Let’s face the facts here guys, If the GOP cared that much about the US Constitution they would immediately vote to defund the NSA, and immediately overturn the Patriot Act. They would put an immediate halt to all domestic spying …toss Eric Holder in jail (versus not having a serious conversation for him to join the Supremes…I could not make this up).

If allowed to go through …Obama’s executive amnesty will provide an estimated 5 million illegal aliens (his number not mine …the real number is likely to be just south of 10 million) with the exact benefits Congress rejected, in violation of federal law. His order will grant them social security numbers, government-issued ID’s, legal status and work permits and cost the US taxpayers an estimated 2 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. Illegal aliens will now be able to take jobs and benefits directly from struggling Americans in a time of high unemployment and low wages. They will be able to take jobs from Americans in all occupations, ranging from truck drivers to power company workers to jobs with city government. Many illegal aliens will also be able to obtain green cards and become permanent residents, allowing them access to almost all federal programs, to receive citizenship and sponsor foreign relatives to join them in the U.S.

FESenator Jeff Sessions said it most succinctly when he wrote:

“In addition to providing formal amnesty benefits for 5 million illegal immigrants, President Obama has also eliminated virtually all enforcement with respect to the other nearly 7 million illegal immigrantsin the United States. As the president’s own former ICE Director, John Sandweg said: “if you are a run-of-the-mill immigrant here illegally, your odds of getting deported are close to zero.”

All you have to do is get into the country from anywhere on globe — whether through the border or by overstaying a visa — and you are free to remain, take jobs and receive benefits. This year alone, the White House has released into the United States more than 100,000 illegal immigrants who simply showed up at the border and demanded entry.

O1

And now, with a single pen stroke, President Obama is obliterating what little remains of Americans’ immigration protections. Not only will millions of low-wage illegal immigrants rush into the labor market, but they will collect billions in taxpayer dollars as well. These costly government benefits range from child tax credits, to public housing to the likelihood that amnestied immigrants will rely on taxpayers for medical and retirement benefits.

Only a short time ago, President Obama himself admitted this action would be illegal and unconstitutional: “I know some people want me to bypass Congress and change the laws on my own” he explained, adding “that’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.” President Obama also said that: “The problem is that I’m the president of the United States, I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed.”

Apparently, America now has its first emperor.

O2

And he has issued an imperial order to dissolve America’s borders. Millions more will enter and demand the same amnesty benefits as those who came before. The entire moral foundation and consistency of our laws will have been eviscerated. Law enforcement officials have repeatedly warned that the president’s new amnesty will unleash a “tidal wave” of illegal immigration. The impact on our jobs, wages, hospitals, schools, police departments and neighborhoods will be crushing.

A second hammer blow will be dealt by the president’s unilateral increase in foreign worker programs for large corporations, including technology corporations. Currently, two-thirds of all new jobs in the IT industry are being filled by foreign workers — and yet the president wants to dramatically surge foreign worker admissions even further. This at a time when the Census Bureau tells us more than 11 million Americanswith science, technology, engineering and math degrees don’t have jobs in those fields.

President Obama is auctioning off America’s middle class to the highest bidders.

Immigration already stands at record levels and is rising quickly. Between 2000 and 2014 — a period during which the government issued nearly 30 million lawful visas to foreign workers and permanent immigrants — all net employment gains among the working-age went to imported labor. Now the president is planning to unilaterally increase immigration even further — all to placate a few billionaire lobbyists and open border extremists.

The great task before the nation now is to resist this imperial decree and return control of this nation to its own citizens — as our Constitution established.

That task begins with Congress refusing to allow a dime of money to be spent executing this unlawful amnesty. This is a routine, constitutional and crucial application of congressional power.

If Democrat lawmakers join Republicans in blocking funds for his unlawful plan, the president will be stopped. Americans must ask their representatives this one question: do you serve the citizens of this country and their Constitution — or not??”

Well??

border_dees

 

6/8/2014 Cameron

If you have been following this story at all, you also probably know that our own Attorney General, Mr. Eric Holder has taken some of the money that was budgeted and intended to be used to secure our borders and is using it to feed and clothe and detain these younger border jumpers, instead of deporting them. This type of conduct should surprise no one due to the lawlessness of this current administration on all matters dealing with illegal immigration. Not only that but Holder and company have decided that they deserve $2 million out of our secure Borders fund to pay for lawyers for illegal aliens… Obama has requested 2 billion… Not to deport the illegals… But to actively feed and house them and deliver them to any relatives already here illegally so they can stay here indefinitely…illegally …all together. In other words our executive department of the United States government is running a travel agency for illegal aliens using our tax dollars and they are doing this in direct defiance of the Constitution of the United States of America and our federal immigration laws.

ObamasIllegals

With Texas being overrun with as many as 50,000 unaccompanied minors in just the first half of this year you have to stop and ask yourself: “where are all of these children coming from and why are they coming here now?” To get the answer to this I reached out to my friend Eric who is a political writer for the Honduras news and asked him what the heck was going on. He told me that the Obama administration has been working with various Central American governments to bring about this planned and deliberate invasion by young illegal aliens. Additionally he said that the various La Raza groups in the area have been spreading the word that Obama is about to sign an administrative Executive Order granting amnesty to all illegal aliens in the country and that the governments of Honduras, and Mexico and El Salvador have been encouraging women and children to make the hike to cross the border into the United States because they have been told that Obama will never deport them and they can receive jobs, green cards, taxpayer-funded welfare, food stamps, housing assistance, cash, education assistance from the US taxpayers forever. Many families have prepared their oldest female child for the crossing and prepped her with what she needs to say and do once she has been captured by the border patrol.

article-0-1E874DAC00000578-228_634x473

Number of Unaccompanied Children Caught Crossing Border Tripled in Past 5 Years

I can only imagine how many more illegals we would have crashing our borders if we had followed Harry Reid’s advice and put everything off until 2015 giving them all a chance to cross over the border and stake their claim to a chunk of our tax dollars. Most recently these children have been taken by airplane and by bus from Texas and driven over the border and dumped on Arizona to support as payback to Gov. Jan Brewer for all of the criticism she has had of this current administration. Arizona lacks the money and facilities to perform these functions and it’s a little uncertain right now what will happen next other than to say they should be deported immediately.

To back this up it has been reported that there is a US government leaflet  that tells Mexican immigrants they can collect food stamp benefits without admitting they’re in the country illegally.

‘A Spanish-language leaflet that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has provided to the Mexican Embassy in Washington advises border-crossing Mexicans that they can collect taxpayer-funded food stamp benefits for their children without admitting that they’re illegal immigrants.

article-0-1E874CBF00000578-122_634x471

Underlined and in boldface type, the document tells immigrants who are unlawfully in the United States that,

You need not divulge information regarding your immigration status in seeking this benefit for your children.’

Our current president and highest law enforcement officer in this country are conspiring to violate our borders and our federal immigration statutes. Their efforts are organized, well-funded, and completely against the will of the American people and our laws. The only question is how much longer are we willing to allow this to continue?

 

 

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL TAGS (Just Ignore):

“A Girl Who Knows Her Own Mind”, ADDITIONAL TAGS (Just Ignore):
agirlwhoknowsherownmind, Rand Paul Revolution Ron Paul Bill Hillary Clinton Barack Obama The Peaceful Revolt Federal Reserve Monetary Collapse Meltdown Horrible Tragedy Hussain Raising Taxes Glenn Beck Fox News CNN MSNBC Big Deal America American Patriots Patriot GOP Republicans Democrats Classical Liberal Liberals Libertarians Global Gun Ban Alex Jones George Bush FEMA Concentration Camps Ron Paul Revolution Rand Paul Revolution Everybody Must Know Completely Viral Ammo 1.6 Billion Bullets purchased by Department of Homeland Security 9 Trillion Dollars Printed and Given to Wallstreet Bailouts Rich 1% Bastards Rand Paul Ron Paul Economy is bad Unemployment 55 million Americans living in Poverty A Nation At War When Does It End ? We Need to Use Our First Amendment Right to peacefully speak about It The Second Amendment Fourth Amendment, 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Amendments targeted by Obama Administration IRS I.R.S. Sick Just Sick Weapons in Syria Ted Cruz Background Checks Rand Paul Revolution Ron Paul Bill Hillary Clinton Barack Obama The Peaceful Revolt Federal Reserve Monetary Collapse Meltdown Horrible Tragedy Hussain Raising Taxes, Cameron Elizabeth Jordan, CEJ, Cameron Jordan, Glenn Beck Fox News CNN MSNBC Big Deal America American Patriots Patriot GOP Republicans Democrats Classical Liberal Liberals Libertarians Global Gun Ban Alex Jones George Bush FEMA Concentration Camps Ron Paul Revolution Rand Paul Revolution Everybody Must Know Completely Viral Ammo 1.6 Billion Bullets purchased by Department of Homeland Security 9 Trillion Dollars Printed and Given to Wallstreet Bailouts Rich 1% Bastards Rand Paul Ron Paul Economy is bad Unemployment 55 million Americans living in Poverty A Nation At War When Does It End ? We Need to Use Our First Amendment Right to peacefully speak about It The Second Amendment Fourth Amendment, 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Amendments targeted by Obama Administration IRS I.R.S. Sick Just Sick Weapons in Syria Ted Cruz Background Checks Rand Paul Revolution Ron Paul Bill Hillary Clinton Barack Obama The Peaceful Revolt Federal Reserve Monetary Collapse Meltdown Horrible Tragedy Hussain Raising Taxes Glenn Beck Fox News CNN MSNBC Big Deal America American Patriots Patriot GOP Republicans Democrats Classical Liberal Liberals Libertarians Global Gun Ban Alex Jones George Bush FEMA Concentration Camps Ron Paul Revolution Rand Paul Revolution Everybody Must Know Completely Viral Ammo 1.6 Billion Bullets purchased by Department of Homeland Security 9 Trillion Dollars Printed and Given to Wallstreet Bailouts Rich 1% Bastards Rand Paul Ron Paul Economy is bad Unemployment 55 million Americans living in Poverty A Nation At War When Does It End ? We Need to Use Our First Amendment Right to peacefully speak about It The Second Amendment Fourth Amendment, 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Amendments targeted by Obama Administration IRS I.R.S. Sick Just Sick Weapons in Syria Ted Cruz Background Checks Spying N.S.A. NSA FBI Tyranny Tommas Jefferson GEORGE Washington Make Yourselves Sheep Wolves will Eat You Benjamin Franklin James Maddison Wall-Street Wall-Street Wall-Street Join Us – http://www.RandPaulRevolution.org – SHARE SHARE MAKE IT GO VIRAL!!

Immigration Reform

By: Ann Coulter
2/13/2014 01:51 AM

Dear Fellow Conservative,

With all the smirking on the left about their electoral victories, it’s important to remember that Democrats haven’t won the hearts and minds of the American people. They changed the people. If you pour vinegar into a bottle of wine, the wine didn’t turn, you poured vinegar into it. Similarly, liberals changed no minds. They added millions of new liberal voters through immigration.

So why are Republicans like Trey Gowdy, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan and John Boehner making fools of themselves in order to spot the Democrats three more touchdowns?

The House Republicans’ “Standards for Immigration Reform,” for example, contains this fat, honking nonsense: “One of the great founding principles of our country was that children would not be punished for the mistakes of their parents.”

14989900902112672049

As the kids say: WTF?

That may be a pleasant-sounding sentiment, but it has absolutely nothing to do with our country’s history. Not the first thing. Did Republicans really think they could pawn off the idea that our forefathers fought and died at Valley Forge so that illegal aliens wouldn’t have to live in the shadows?

Yeah, it was a long shot. We didn’t know you guys had read the Constitution. We’ll be quiet now.

Apart from the fact that protecting children from the mistakes of their parents has not the slightest connection with the nation’s founding, it’s a ridiculous concept.

Yes, children suffer when their parents break the law. Also when their parents get divorced, become alcoholics, don’t read to them at night, feed them junk food and take them to Justin Bieber concerts. None of that is the child’s fault.

But it’s not the country’s fault either.

If we have to excuse lawbreaking so as not to “punish the children,” there’s no end to the crimes that have to be forgiven — insider trading, theft, rape, murder and so on.

How do you think kids feel when their father has to “live in the shadows” because he committed a rape? The kids did nothing wrong, but they have to go to bed every night wondering: Is tomorrow the day Dad is going to be caught?

How do you function like that? And how awful it must be when their dad is sent to prison! How do you think Jack Abramoff’s kids felt? What about Martha Stewart’s kid?

Why not just forgive the crimes of all perpetrators who have kids? At a minimum, shouldn’t we allow criminals to defer their sentences until their kids turn 26 so they can stay on Dad’s health insurance? Or at least until their kids have gone to college? Chris Christie can give them in-state tuition!

“It’s not the kids’ fault” proves too much. People can get away with anything if they’re willing to use their children as trump cards to avoid the force of law.

The once-respected Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., compared illegal aliens brought here as kids to children who steal a grape or scream in a restaurant:

“When children wander into neighborhood yards, we don’t call that trespassing. When children cry and yell and scream at restaurants or on airplanes, we don’t call that a violation of the noise ordinance. When children eat a grape at the grocery store or eat a piece of candy waiting in line before Mom or Dad pays for it, we don’t have them arrested for petty larceny.”

Yes, but in those cases, both the child and his parents had a right to be where they were — the yard, restaurant or grocery store — when the child suddenly behaved like a child. With illegal aliens, the parents are more like gypsies teaching their kids to beg and pick pockets. The parents forced the kids into being lawbreakers.

Similarly, Palestinians use their children to commit acts of terrorism against Israel, so that when Israel responds, the parents can wail, “They’re bombing children!”

(I thought only liberals couldn’t do analogies.)

Americans are under no moral obligation to admit huge numbers of people who have no particular right to be here just because the Democrats need 30 million new voters.

Why shouldn’t Republicans oppose mass immigration on the grounds that immigrants will vote Democratic? The only reason the Democrats want mass immigration is because they know immigrants will vote Democratic. (Also for the cheap nannies and gardeners.)

Immigration is the “single issue” that decides every other issue. If this country were the same demographically today as it was in 1980, Romney would have won a bigger victory in 2012 than Reagan did against Carter. And we wouldn’t have to hear about soccer all the time.

We’re living in a different country now, and I can’t recall moving! Had I wanted to live in Japan, I could have moved there. Had I had wanted to live in Mexico, Pakistan or Chechnya — I could have moved to those places, too.

(Although maybe not. They all have stricter immigration policies than we do.)

CONTINUED AT THE SOURCE….CLICK

reverse-illegal-immigration

A population perhaps the size of Australia’s or four mid-sized EU nations’ strolled into America and decided to stay. In doing so, they broke the law. Literally. That’s to say, some of the most basic laws of the nation lie shattered and discarded.

Ours is a highly legalistic society with laws against everything and anything …most of them with stiff jail sentences attached. Yet a group of squatters has rendered our laws irrelevant. How did this happen? Hell, four of the  alleged September 11 terrorists obtained the picture ID they used to board the plane through the illegal-immigrant day-worker network in the parking lot of the 7-Eleven in Falls Church, Va.

But 3,000 corpses wasn’t enough to persuade either the citizenry or their representatives to end their indulgence of such networks. Quite the opposite …OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS ARE SELLING OUT OUR COUNTRY TO BUY VOTES!

amnesty-unemployment

it’s estimated that half of the “undocumented” have come here since 9/11: That’s to say, they broke into a country on Code Orange alert.
Republican immigration reformers with an eye to political reality should begin by appreciating that Latinos are a Democratic constituency. …AND ONCE THEY BECOME LEGAL AND THE CHAIN MIGRATION MACHINE GETS STARTED UP ….it will be a PERMANENT RELIABLE DEMOCRAT VOTE! Imagine where this country would be today if the left would of had super-majorities in both houses for the last 6 years? with no ability for what they want to do blocked?

And, if we are to take Hispanics at their word, conservative attitudes toward illegal immigration are a minor reason for their voting preferences. While many are in business for themselves, they express hostile attitudes toward free enterprise in polls.

Anti-Amnesty Groups Rally Against Immigration Reform In DC

They are disproportionately low-income and disproportionately likely to receive some form of government support.

More than half of Hispanic births are out of wedlock.

Take away the Spanish surname and Latino voters look exactly like many other Democratic constituencies all with their hand out and none willing to put this country ahead of their own selfish need for other peoples money and the fruits of someone else’s labors.

If we don’t let our voices be heard RIGHT NOW! then what we will end up with is a de facto legalization, a de facto amnesty, and everything else will just go by the book. There’ll be no serious enforcement, there’ll be in effect a doubling of legal, of the rate of
legal immigration, there’ll be continued illegal immigration across the Southern border, and in effect, the country will be lost. THIS IS HAPPENING NOW! HERE IS THE LEAST YOU CAN DO!!

cost-of-illegal-aliens

NumbersUSA has prewritten customizable letters they will properly format and fax to your congress people right now~!…These letters are directly onpoint …thoughtful…and well written and here is the best news …I timed it and it takes you 30 seconds to register and another 30 seconds before you are faxing off your first email… These faxes make a huge difference …join over 1 million fellow americans and take a few minutes to save this country

Here are the fourteen Republican Senators who have sold us out to the corporations and illegal alien lobby ….let them know what you think.. They and Roger Wicker, are the biggest traitors since Benedict Arnold. Remember them and get them out of office.

boehner-ryan

  • Lamar Alexander
  • Kelly Ayotte
  • Jeffrey Chiesa
  • Susan Collins
  • Bob Corker
  • Jeff Flake
  • Lindsey Graham
  • Orrin Hatch
  • Dean Heller
  • John Hoeven
  • Mark Kirk
  • John McCain
  • Lisa Murkowski
  • Marco Rubio
The Car Guyz

Auto Industry Experts Playing for the Other Team ...You!

FOX News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The Rush Limbaugh Show

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Breitbart News

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Drudge Retort

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

Fathers' Rights Blog

by Jeffery M. Leving

therightwingextremist

Stomping out Liberal Lunacy Whereever it's Found ...Which lately has been like playing Whack -A- Mole

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: